Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
search DONATE
Close Nav

The Racial Redistricting of Alabama

back to top
commentary

The Racial Redistricting of Alabama

The Wall Street Journal October 3, 2022
OtherMiscellaneous
Legal ReformSupreme Court

The Supreme Court has a chance to reaffirm the colorblind ideals behind the Voting Rights Act.

The Supreme Court hears arguments Tuesday in an election case from Alabama—a case that could decide how far the federal courts can go when they require state legislatures to consider race in drawing boundaries for congressional and state legislative districts.

At issue is Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibits states from abridging on the basis of race the right to vote. The plaintiffs in this current case, Merrill v. Milligan—along with those in a companion case, Merrill v. Caster—are legislators and advocacy groups that claim the VRA requires the state to consider race as a major factor in mapping districts, while Alabama claims that maps should be drawn on a race-neutral basis.

Continue reading the entire piece at The Wall Street Journal (paywall)

______________________

James Piereson is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

Photo by Jacqueline Nix/iStock

Saved!
Close