Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.


Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
search DONATE
Close Nav

Pandemic Philanthropy and Its Critics

back to top

Pandemic Philanthropy and Its Critics

Washington Examiner June 5, 2020

“That’s how we handle a global pandemic?” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo railed at a press conference last month. “I have to call Mr. Kraft and say, 'Can you do me a favor? … As long as the plane is going, can you pick up masks for me?” Cuomo’s complaint was not only that we are dependent on China for protective gear, but also that he has to rely on a wealthy private citizen, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, to bring protective gear for New Yorkers.

The governor of New York is not the only one annoyed by this turn of events. In a recent piece for Wired, Rob Reich, the faculty co-director of the Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society, and Mohit Mookim, a researcher at the Center for Ethics in Society at Stanford University, bemoaned that “when the government fails us, one temptation is to look to rich people like Bill Gates.” But, they noted: “We should never be dependent on the whims of wealthy donors … for our collective health and well-being. … That would be a betrayal of democracy. Rather than democratic processes determining our collective needs and how to address them, the wealthy would decide for us. We wanted rule by the many; we may get rule by the rich.”

An article in Vox also expressed anxiety about how much philanthropists are doing to help during the pandemic. As Theodore Schleifer writes: “For all the wealthy’s good deeds, this status quo raises alarming questions about the long-term dangers of this dependency on this private sector and its generosity, especially about the world we’ll inherit once the dust settles.”

There is plenty of reason for alarm these days — about our health, the economy, and the incompetence of our leaders. But it is not clear that Bill Gates or Robert Kraft are deciding anything for us. They are responding to a variety of needs and requests. The fact that they are not all putting their money to the same uses suggests that “rule by the rich” is not quite the monolith that their detractors describe. One of the most important aspects of American philanthropy is the diversity of causes it supports and approaches it takes.

Continue reading the entire piece here at the Washington Examiner (paywall)


James Piereson is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. 

Naomi Schaefer Riley is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a senior fellow at the Independent Women’s Forum.

Photo by Getty Images/Getty Images for Global Citizen