Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.

Contact

Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed

Manhattan Institute

search
Close Nav

Is Nuclear Power Too Radioactive for Democrats?

commentary

Is Nuclear Power Too Radioactive for Democrats?

Chicago Tribune July 31, 2019
Energy & EnvironmentTechnology / InfrastructureRegulations

With the second round of the Democratic presidential debates this week, many left-leaning voters are eager to see if climate issues will garner more attention than they did in June, when audiences were left disappointed with the lack of focus on the environment.

But even a whole night focused on climate policy — and CNN plans to host one in September, they announced Thursday — wouldn’t change the fact that the renewable energy sources that the left touts (wind, solar and batteries) can take us only so far. Wind and solar are inherently unreliable, and batteries cost too much and store too little energy to make up for it.

If the candidates are unwilling to bring nuclear power into the national conversation, then they’re not taking seriously their party’s requests for decarbonization. Conversation is the key word here, because the greatest obstacle blocking nuclear power isn’t safety issues or technological shortcomings — it’s bad PR and political grandstanding.

Continue reading the entire piece here at the Chicago Tribune

______________________

Jonathan A. Lesser, PhD, is an adjunct fellow at the Manhattan Institute, president of Continental Economics consulting, and author of the new report, “Is There a Future for Nuclear Power in the United States?

Photo by alcfeoh21/iStock

Saved!
Close