Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.

Contact

Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed

Manhattan Institute

search
Close Nav

New Report Proves Trump Was Right to Rescind Obama-Era School Discipline Policies

commentary

New Report Proves Trump Was Right to Rescind Obama-Era School Discipline Policies

Washington Examiner August 6, 2019
EducationPre K-12

When President Trump rescinded an Obama-era directive pressuring schools to adopt lenient discipline policies, almost every major education advocacy organization united in outrage.

Despite Pulitzer-Prize-winning reporting showing how similarly lenient disciplinary policies allowed the Parkland school shooter to slip through the cracks, the liberal media insinuated that it was absurd for the Trump administration to recommend rescission of Obama-era lenient policies.

And despite study after study showing that these leniency policies hurt some students, advocates insinuated that the Trump administration was oppressing students of color by ending a policy intended to help them.

Fortunately, a recent Thomas B. Fordham institute teacher survey has given teachers a real voice on this issue. The Obama administration declared flatly that “suspensions don’t work.” The report reveals that teachers overwhelmingly disagree.

Roughly 80% of teachers believe that suspensions are useful to send a signal to students’ parents about serious misbehavior and around 85% believe that temporarily removing disruptive students helps well-behaved students learn. Meanwhile, nearly 80% believe that suspensions help ensure a safe school environment and almost 70% think suspensions encourage other students to follow the rules.

Although many teachers fear that suspensions may negatively affect misbehaving students, roughly 60% believe suspensions can be a deterrent to misbehavior. And many more teachers disagree with the statement “the harms of suspensions outweigh the benefits” than agree with it.

The Obama-era disciplinary policy pressured school districts to decrease suspensions, and suspensions did in fact decrease substantially. But about 70% of teachers believed that the decline was at least somewhat due to a higher tolerance for misbehavior, and almost half believed it was due to under-reporting, suspending students without officially recording it.

The Obama administration was motivated in part by the belief that African American students were being discriminated against in school discipline. This is a concern that teachers share.

Notably, there’s a substantial difference between perceptions of unfairness by the race of a teacher. About a quarter of white teachers believe that a black student will be disciplined more harshly for the same infraction, compared to about three quarters of African American teachers.

Even more notable, though, is that despite this difference in perception of discrimination, African American and white teachers are on the exact same page when it comes to school discipline policy. Among white teachers, 46% believe that suspensions are used too little and 9% percent believe they are used too frequently. Among black teachers, 50% believe that suspensions are used too little and 7% believe they are used too frequently.

Last month, the United States Commission on Civil Rights issued a report which noted that students with disabilities are disciplined too frequently and lamented that discrimination was at work. Teachers agree that students with disabilities are discriminated against when it comes to school discipline — they just believe that the discrimination goes in the opposite direction as what detached government bureaucrats assumed.

Almost 55% believe that students with disabilities were treated more leniently for the same offense.

In truth, studies have shown that students with disabilities are not disciplined more frequently once basic demographic factors are taken into account. The only group for which this is not true is students with “Emotional and Behavioral Disturbances.”

That is to say, students who behave badly are disciplined more frequently.

Unfortunately, Obama-era leniency policies pressure school districts to discipline students who behave badly at the same rate as students who behave well. These policies pressure school districts to keep disruptive students in the classroom and under-record their misbehavior.

This leaves teachers feeling isolated in their classrooms, and afraid to speak out for fear of retaliation by principals fixated on keeping their numbers down. But this recent poll shows that teachers are not alone and, hopefully, will help everyone understand why the Trump administration was right to revoke Obama's failing discipline policies.

This piece originally appeared at the Washington Examiner

______________________

Max Eden is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and author of a new report, Safe and Orderly Schools: Updated Guidance on School Discipline. Follow him on Twitter here.

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Saved!
Close