Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.

Donation - Other Level

Please use the quantity box to donate any amount you wish. Sign Up to Donate

Contact

Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

Password Reset Request

Register


Add a topic or expert to your feed.

Following

Follow Experts & Topics

Stay on top of our work by selecting topics and experts of interest.

Experts
Topics
Project
On The Ground
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed

Manhattan Institute

search
Close Nav

MI Responds

All Projects
Real-time commentary from Manhattan Institute scholars, MI Responds features quick, expert analysis from our fellows on breaking news and developing issues in the United States and around the globe.

Manhattan Institute scholars regularly appear on local and national television and are cited by publications across the country and the world to provide expert analysis on the issues.

________________________

SENATE TAX REFORM VOTE

The Senate has finally passed landmark tax reform legislation. Despite reports to the contrary, the Senate bill provides broad-based tax cuts across all incomes. The typical middle-income family would receive an $850 annual tax cut. The bill would make the tax code even more progressive. The bottom 80 percent of families currently pay 33 percent of all combined federal taxes, yet would get 37 percent of the tax cuts. By contrast, the top one percent currently pays 27 percent of all federal taxes, but would get just 18 percent of the tax cuts. The result would be wealthy families paying a larger portion of the federal tax burden.

Now the real work begins. A conference committee must fix the House and Senate legislative flaws and build a workable final product. The top priority must be to strengthen and protect the corporate tax reforms that constitute the most pro-growth portion of these bills. Specifically, it is vital to retain the proposed 20 percent corporate tax rate, full business investment expensing, and territorial taxation reforms. The base erosion standards and recently-raised international “toll charge,” are an acceptable price to protect this corporate tax modernization.

On the individual side, lawmakers should protect the $2,000 child tax credit expansion and maintain low tax rates without the House’s 46% “bubble” tax rate. The Senate’s failure to repeal the AMT and estate tax must give way to the House’s terminations – even if they require new offsets, such as repealing the step-up basis tax loophole that allows heirs to escape capital gains taxes on their inheritances.

The Senate’s pass-through business deduction has reportedly grown to 23%, with an expansion of eligible income. This larger deduction creates additional incentives to game the system and reclassify income, so the design of anti-abuse guardrails is even more important.

Congress continues to work within the $1.5 trillion cap provided in the budget resolution, with a Byrd Rule requirement for deficit-neutrality after 2027. Still, lawmakers should strive to maximize tax policy permanence, even if it means moderating certain reforms. Incorporating economic growth revenues should drive the ten-year cost down to roughly $1 trillion ($1.5 trillion assuming expiring policies are extended). While this cost is a legitimate issue to further address in conference, context is also necessary. Tax reform will raise the ten-year deficit from $10 trillion to $11.5 trillion while also modernizing the corporate tax code and aiding families. Future deficits will be overwhelmingly driven by Social Security and Medicare’s $82 trillion deficit over the next 30 years. Lawmakers who wish to maintain a low tax burden must address these long-term costs.

With a Congressional majority now on the record voting for tax reform, a successful conference committee compromise is likely assured. The vital question is whether the conference committee can protect the best of the House and Senate reforms.

Brian Riedl, Senior Fellow

 

PREVIOUS MI RESPONSES

 

Senate Tax Reform Vote
Brian Riedl | December 2, 2017
Judge Sides with White House on CFPB
James R. Copland | November 29, 2017
Ohio Drug Pricing Vote
Dr. Tom Coburn | November 8, 2017
House GOP Tax Reform Bill
Brian Riedl | November 2, 2017
CFPB Arbitration Rule Repealed
James R. Copland | October 25, 2017
Trump's Health Care Executive Order
Chris Pope | October 12, 2017
August 2017 Jobs Report
Diana Furchtgott-Roth | September 1, 2017
Trump Proposes Budget for 2018
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Brian Riedl, Oren Cass | May 23, 2017
Scott Gottlieb Confirmed as FDA Commissioner
Paul Howard, Tom Coburn | April 7, 2017
Neil Gorsuch Confirmed to the Supreme Court
Jim Copland, Rafael Mangual | April 7, 2017
Seema Verma Confirmed to Head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Paul Howard, Oren Cass, Yevgeniy Feyman | March 14, 2017
President Trump's Address to Congress
Brian Riedl, Paul Howard, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Max Eden | February 28, 2017
Scott Pruitt Confirmed to Lead the EPA
Oren Cass | February 17, 2017
Gorsuch Nominiated for Supreme Court
James R. Copland | February 1, 2017
December 2016 Jobs Report
Diana Furchtgott-Roth | January 6, 2017
The 21st Century Cures Act
Paul Howard | November 30, 2016
Trump's Child Care Policy Proposals
Kay S. Hymowitz | September 14, 2016
On the Forthcoming CFPB Arbitration Rule
James R. Copland | May 4, 2016
NYC Retreats from Broken Windows Policing
Heather Mac Donald | March 2, 2016
2016 State of the Union on Criminal Justice
Heather Mac Donald | January 13, 2016
2016 State of the Union on Curing Cancer
Paul Howard | January 13, 2016
2016 State of the Union on Higher Education
Preston Cooper | January 12, 2016
On Lifting the Oil Export Ban
Mark P. Mills | December 15, 2015
Saved!
Close