Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.


Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
search DONATE
Close Nav

Pre-Retroactive Pay Raises

back to top
issue brief

Pre-Retroactive Pay Raises

January 24, 2014
Public SectorOther
EducationPre K-12

Mayor Bill de Blasio said the city’s current round of collective bargaining “may be the hardest assignment that anyone in the history of labor relations in this city has taken on.”

The new mayor will have to reach contract agreement with 152 different unions representing nearly 300,000 municipal employees (see Appendix for a breakdown of unions and average salaries). The budgetary stakes will be highest for the largest of those unions, the 116,000-member United Federation of Teachers (UFT). While the city’s contracts with its other major unions expired in 2010 and 2011, the UFT agreement expired in October 2009, and the last base salary increase for teachers took effect in May 2008.

In a union catchphrase widely echoed by the news media, UFT members—including more than 80,000 teachers—have been "working without a contract" longer than any other city employees. A contract giving teachers the same 4 percent annual raises granted to other unions in the 2008-10 round of collective bargaining would add $3.5 billion to the 2014 budget, the Citizens Budget Commission estimated.[1] Billions more would flow from giving UFT and other unions additional "retro" pay for subsequent years, broadening the expense base for additional raises going forward. Going forward, each additional percentage point increase for all city workers would cost about $300 million a year, according to an estimate issued by the Office of Management and Budget before Mayor Bloomberg left office.

But for teachers, in particular, working without a contract doesn’t amount to working without any pay raises. Thanks to the Triborough Amendment, a state law requiring all contract provisions to remain in effect until a new agreement is reached, a sizable majority of teachers received salary increases during the first four years after the last UFT contract expired.[2]

This paper draws on five years of actual city payrolls to calculate the fiscal impact of Triborough-driven pay hikes for teachers continuously employed by the city from 2009 to 2013, as well as teachers hired since 2009 but continuously employed since then. Key findings:

  • Salary increases during the period totaled $1.2 billion, adding $469 million to city operating costs for 2013 alone.
  • For the 57,983 teachers who had not already risen to the top of the pay scale by 2009, average salaries rose over the next four years by an average of $8,086—or nearly 12 percent. The average annual raise of 2.8 percent outpaced the local inflation rate, which averaged 2 percent during the same period.
  • Including pension contributions and payroll taxes, total compensation for teachers continuously employed during this period increased by $932 million a year, with a cumulative four-year increase of $2.1 billion.

For most current teachers, a retroactive increase won’t end a pay raise drought. Rather, it will compound the value of step and longevity increases already paid by the city.

In the coming months, Mayor de Blasio will need to bargain complex trade-offs with the UFT and other city unions to hold compensation costs at a level the city can afford. But in all cases, the city should insist on contractual provisions suspending further pay increases after the next collective bargaining agreements expire. This will give unions greater incentive to come to the table and avoid working without a contract in the future.