Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.

Donation - Other Level

Please use the quantity box to donate any amount you wish. Sign Up to Donate

Contact

Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

Password Reset Request

Register


Add a topic or expert to your feed.

Following

Follow Experts & Topics

Stay on top of our work by selecting topics and experts of interest.

Experts
Topics
Project
On The Ground
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed

Manhattan Institute

search
Close Nav
Share this press_release on Close

New Report: Municipal Pension Programs in Connecticut are Becoming Increasingly Unaffordable

press release

New Report: Municipal Pension Programs in Connecticut are Becoming Increasingly Unaffordable

June 21, 2018

NEW YORK, NY – Connecticut cities are under strain in trying to fund their long-term retirement benefit liabilities. Like Connecticut state government, these problems are rooted in part in poor management. But better management may only go so far in stabilizing cities’ pension programs.

Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Stephen Eide suggests in a new report that dramatic retirement benefit reform may be more urgent to shift to defined contribution for city workers in Connecticut than state workers.

Bridgeport, New Haven, Hartford, Stamford and Waterbury have promised hundreds of millions of dollars in benefits to its workers, but with the exception of Stamford, they all have weak economies and elevated rates of poverty. A weak local economy raises questions about the affordability of defined-benefit programs.

Eide notes that:

  • Hartford, New Haven, Stamford and Waterbury operate their own independent pension systems. Bridgeport participates in a statewide system but the city is responsible for meeting its own pension obligations. All of these cities also offer retiree health-benefit programs that are run locally.
  • The increase in property tax revenue hasn’t kept up with the need for more pension funds in New Haven, Hartford, and Stamford. Hartford’s property tax revenues, for example, grew by $2.7 million from FY08 to FY17 in real terms, while its pension costs grew by $16.7 million.
  • While annual costs for retiree health care have not risen as dramatically, they are still high, totaling $132 million for all five cities. This is a questionable expenditure, since the private sector has largely phased out health-care benefits for retired workers.
  • At both the state and local level, rising pension costs have “crowded out” funds available for infrastructure, the social safety net and other public services in Connecticut.

Click here to read the full report.

Contact

Rachel O’Brien
State & Local Media Manager
(646) 839-3335
robrien@manhattan-institute.org

Saved!
Close