Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.

Donation - Other Level

Please use the quantity box to donate any amount you wish. Sign Up to Donate

Contact

Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

Password Reset Request

Register


Add a topic or expert to your feed.

Following

Follow Experts & Topics

Stay on top of our work by selecting topics and experts of interest.

Experts
Topics
Project
On The Ground
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed

Manhattan Institute

search
Close Nav

Identifying Effective Prisoner Reentry Strategies

report

Identifying Effective Prisoner Reentry Strategies

May 2, 2017
OtherPrisoner Reentry
Urban PolicyCrimeWelfare

Abstract

State and federal prisons release approximately 650,000 inmates each year. Within the first year following their release, more than half of them are unable to find a job and earn enough legal income to survive. The most recent government national survey estimated that within three years of their release from prison, two-thirds of ex-offenders are arrested for a new crime. This study identifies some promising initiatives that help integrate former prisoners into society and that possibly contribute to bringing down the rate of recidivism. We examined reentry programs in New Jersey and New York City to identify their strengths and weaknesses. We also examined public and nonprofit programs serving both youth and young adults, some who have completed high school equivalency and others who have not. The goal was to determine which programs may be most effective for the most at-risk parolees; the relative merits of transitional employment, short-term training, or direct employment; and the effectiveness of academic tracks at community colleges.

Key Findings

  1. Transitional employment—usually menial work in public instituti ons or nonprofit organizations, with no development of occupational skills—does not seem to im prove ex-offenders’ long-term job prospects but does modestly reduce recidivism. Programs that devote time to occupational training alone show some modest positive effect on employment but not on reducing recidivism.
  2. Programs that focus on reintegrating ex-prisoners into their communities, combining occupational training, mentoring, social services, and some education, have shown promising reductions in recidivism among certain kinds of offenders, particularly those with substance-abuse or mental-health problems, over a sustained period.
  3. Reintegration initiatives that offer high school equivalency education (during or immediately after incarceration) can be effective for increasing employment and reducing recidivism. But programs that offer certification of skills in specific kinds of jobs may be the best choice for offenders who hav e had difficulty in academic/ classroom settings.
  4. Based on a survey of the research literature and our field investigation, there is no “one size fits all” approach to improving the job prospects and reducing the arrest rates of ex-offenders.

READ FULL REPORT

_____________________

Robert Cherry is professor of economics at Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center. 

Mary Gatta is an associate professor of sociology at CUNY-Stella and Charles Guttman Community College.

Saved!
Close