Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.

Donation - Other Level

Please use the quantity box to donate any amount you wish. Sign Up to Donate

Contact

Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

Password Reset Request

Register


Add a topic or expert to your feed.

Following

Follow Experts & Topics

Stay on top of our work by selecting topics and experts of interest.

Experts
Topics
Project
On The Ground
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed

Manhattan Institute

search
Close Nav
Share this commentary on Close

De Blasio's Housing-Killing Class Warfare

commentary

De Blasio's Housing-Killing Class Warfare

New York Post March 27, 2017
Urban PolicyHousingNYC

New York has a problem: buying an apartment here is way too expensive. Mayor de Blasio has grouchily ambled along with a solution: make apartments even more expensive.

That makes no sense. But it’s the principle of the mayor’s proposed “mansion tax.” Last week, de Blasio went up to Albany to push his idea: forcing home buyers to pay a “paltry” 2.5 percent tax on the value of purchases above $2 million.

The tax would raise $336 million a year. That would be enough to subsidize 25,000 poorer elderly folks’ rent by a little more than $1,000 a month, as the mayor told attendees at two senior centers last week.

Helping seniors is a fine idea. But the good news is that New York will take in $57 billion from existing taxes in the fiscal year that starts in July, a nearly $2.2 billion increase from the current year. If it’s so important, the mayor can find a way to pay for it with all of that extra money.

But no. That’s boring. “We can do something different and better,” de Blasio told Upper East Side seniors Thursday. “People who can afford a $2 million home . . . can afford to give a little more.”

Inconveniently for the mayor, New York already thought of this “different and better” idea . . . in 1959.

Anyone selling a home whose value is above $1 million already pays.....

Read the entire piece here at the New York Post

______________________

Nicole Gelinas is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and contributing editor at City Journal. Follow her on Twitter here.

Photo by Pool / Getty

Saved!
Close