Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.

Contact

Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.

Email Article

ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
search DONATE
Close Nav

Green Energy’s Overseas Dependence

back to top
commentary

Green Energy’s Overseas Dependence

National Review Online July 5, 2020
Energy & EnvironmentTechnology / Infrastructure

The energy sources that environmentalists want us to depend on are themselves dependent on overseas materials and components.

Children scrabbling with bare hands, never mind shovels, and carrying bags of rocks is not the image Elon Musk wants for his wildly successful green-car company. So, in early June, Tesla signed a deal with global miner, Glencore, to help “ethically” source an increased supply of cobalt from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where child labor accounts for “only” one-fifth of mining for that critical battery element.

For its part, Ford plans to get batteries for its electric vehicles (EVs) from China’s BYD and leave it to that company to determine sources of “energy minerals.” So it bears noting that about 60 percent of the world’s cobalt is mined in the DRC. There’s a lot more to the supply-chain story when you look under the hood at what’s required to “fuel” aspirations for a world dominated by battery-powered electric vehicles and fields of solar and wind farms. For America, such a future would mean dramatically increased energy dependencies.

A hidden-in-plain-sight fact: All green-energy machines require minerals obtained almost entirely overseas. Much of it comes from countries that are not our friends, and many entail labor and environmental practices most companies are eager to ignore.

But now House Democrats propose that green-energy subsidies must be a key feature in any infrastructure stimulus — and they’ve recently been seriously considering a $1.5 trillion version of such a bill. That legislation seems unlikely to pass the Senate, or a presidential veto, but we can be sure the idea won’t go away. Ironically, this comes on the heels of the coronavirus crisis exposing supply-chain vulnerabilities that have triggered a push to on-shore many industries, not just medical manufacturing.

Continue reading the entire piece here at National Review Online

______________________

Mark P. Mills is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a faculty fellow at Northwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering, and author of the new book, Digital Cathedrals.

Photo by RossHelen/iStock

Saved!
Close