Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
search DONATE
Close Nav

Energy Tech Won’t Progress Like Computing

back to top
commentary

Energy Tech Won’t Progress Like Computing

The Wall Street Journal November 30, 2022
Energy & EnvironmentTechnology / Infrastructure

A switch to batteries, solar panels and wind turbines entails increased use of mined minerals to produce the same amount of energy.

Bravo to Nick Stork and Joe Malchow (“One Man’s Trash Is Another’s Clean Fuel,” op-ed, Nov. 21) for endorsing an energy “price system untouched by government.” But in their otherwise sensible case for a bright energy future, they make a fundamental mistake by repeating a pernicious analogy: “The energy future may mirror computing’s past . . . [as] is happening with lithium-ion batteries today.” No, it won’t, and no, it isn’t.

If battery chemistry followed the arc of computing’s progress, we would soon power a jumbo jet across the Atlantic with one battery the size of a cereal box. Similarly, if silicon photocells followed the trajectory of silicon transistors, we would soon power all Manhattan with a solar panel the size of a page of the Journal. Only in comic books, however, does energy technology advance at the pace of information technology (aka Moore’s Law).

Continue reading the entire piece here at The Wall Street Journal (Paywall)

______________________

Mark P. Mills is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute; a partner in Cottonwood Venture Partners, an energy-tech venture fund. 

Photo by bombermoon/iStock

Saved!
Close