Your current web browser is outdated. For best viewing experience, please consider upgrading to the latest version.
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
ERROR
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
search DONATE
Close Nav

Contempt of Court

back to top
commentary

Contempt of Court

Washington Examiner August 11, 2022
Legal ReformOther

Deep into the summer after a historic Supreme Court term, the Left’s criticism of the court is unrelenting — and in need of a thesaurus. The word “rogue” has been used to describe not only the high-profile rulings on religion, environmental regulation, guns, and, of course, abortion, but also decisions on Indian law and Miranda rights, the court’s supposed threat to same-sex marriage, and how it’s “stacked with fanatics and lunatics.” “The Supreme Court Has Gone Rogue,” proclaimed MSNBC. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) demanded that Democratic Party leaders “share their plans” to solve the problem of “a rogue court.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) chimed in: “Congress must protect our democracy from this rogue Court.” The Congressional Progressive Caucus put out a statement insisting, "We must hold these rogue justices to account.”

And what would they like to be done about it? “The Constitution provides a number of paths by which Congress can restrain and discipline a rogue court,” suggested New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie at term’s end, enumerating possible types of legislation (plus impeachment). Paying attention was none other than Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), who recently introduced a Supreme Court Review Act to “check the Court’s rogue decisions.”

Continue reading the entire piece here at the Washington Examiner

______________________

Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow and director of Constitutional Studies at the Manhattan Institute. Follow him on Twitter here

Photo by Douglas Rissing/iStock

Saved!
Close