Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      

USA Today


Not Affordable Care Act: Opposing View

September 24, 2013

By Avik Roy

In most states, premiums will increase.

Imagine that Congress passed a law requiring all cars sold in America to use hybrid engines. If you’re concerned about our consumption of fossil fuels, such a law might sound great. However, as anyone who has shopped for a car knows, hybrid cars are much more expensive than conventional ones.

ObamaCare is doing something similar to health insurance, especially for people who buy it on their own. The law forces insurers to charge the same rates to the healthy and the sick. It mandates that insurers cover services that the government deems "essential," such as drug-addiction therapy, that most people don’t need. It forces young people to pay much more, so as to partially subsidize the elderly.

There’s no such thing as a free lunch. All these new rules make health insurance more expensive. And people across the political spectrum are concerned. This month, the AFL-CIO passed a resolution complaining that ObamaCare’s litany of taxes and fees "will drive the costs of ... union administered plans, and other plans that cover unionized workers, to unsupportable levels."

In order to study this problem, I and my colleagues at the Manhattan Institute assembled an interactive map, which you can find by Googling the phrase "ObamaCare cost map." It illustrates how premiums will change across the country.

In most states, the cost of individually purchased health insurance will increase significantly, as much as 160%. A handful of states will see average rates go down. But that’s generally because those states, like New York, had long ago imposed ObamaCare-like mandates that made insurance unaffordable for the young and healthy. Nationally, so far, we’ve found that ObamaCare will increase premiums in the individual market by an average of 24%.

Poorer Americans will be insulated from these increases by ObamaCare’s subsidies. But the middle class will face a double whammy: higher premiums, along with higher taxes to pay for the subsidies that others receive. Younger, healthier Americans will get hit especially hard under this system.

And everyone agrees that the success of ObamaCare hinges on the Obama administration’s ability to persuade young people to buy in — to pay for insurance that is even costlier than the coverage they already can’t afford. That isn’t what Democrats promised when they named their bill "The Affordable Care Act."

Original Source:



5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldn’t Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked “Ebola Czar” With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is Unclear­—Just As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14


The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494