Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

City & State

 

Congestion Zoning

February 28, 2013

By Nicole Gelinas

City Hall has identified a problem plaguing midtown: a dearth of tall glass towers. With 314 days left, Mayor Bloomberg wants to rush through a rezoning of the area around Grand Central. City Council Speaker Christine Quinn should show her independence by slowing this thing down—to make sure that new skyscrapers above ground don’t cause dangerous transit crushes below ground.

Bloomberg wants "iconic new buildings" for midtown East, he said last week in his final State of the City address. "Zoning regulations around Grand Central effectively prohibit development," he said, "even though the area has the best mass transit links in the entire country."

The mayor said that changing the law is now or never. "Given all the politics and special interests, if we don’t do it this year, it may never get done," he warned.

But to see why midtown residents and commuters can’t trust the city to make sure that its subway system keeps up with daytime population growth, just look to Brooklyn. Nearly a decade ago, in 2005, the City Council approved Bloomberg’s rezoning of much of Williamsburg and Greenpoint to allow for dense residential construction.

Ridership on the L train into Manhattan soared. Between 2005 and 2010 weekday ridership increased by a third to nearly 132,000 people. Even as the MTA increased service, rush hour trains remained overcrowded. The state-run MTA noted in 2011 that "trains continue to carry loads above guidelines," meaning that standing passengers don’t get their allotted three square feet. Commuters could wait for three trains to pass by before they could squeeze on.

This was predictable. Ridership was growing before the rezoning. But residents have had to lobby heavily to get more service, and they have had to wait. Today things are marginally better. But it won’t be until this autumn that the MTA adds a waterfront bus service to ease travel within growing Brooklyn neighborhoods.

If the City Council allows for midtown rezoning now and transit fixes later, midtown will have the same problem. "The Lexington Avenue line"—the 4, 5 and 6 trains—"is at 116 percent capacity today, even before you add density," notes City Councilman Dan Garodnick, who represents the area around Grand Central as well as parts of the Upper East Side.

Subway waiting areas at Grand Central are uncomfortably overcrowded even off-rush hours. Commuters gingerly pick their way around bulky staircases on narrow platforms.

Yes, the full Second Avenue Subway project, which would go from 125th Street to Hanover Square downtown, would eventually ease crowding. But the key word is eventually. The MTA is building only "phase one": three new stations plus one new transfer on the Upper East Side, out of a planned 16 for the whole route.

The Bloomberg folks have nodded to worries about more midtown subway crowding. Last month they said they’d require developers looking to build more densely to contribute to transit improvements. Those projects would include $400 million for the MTA to fix platforms and make other improvements at Grand Central and at 53rd Street.

But why hasn’t the city already done this? Lexington conditions have been intolerable for a decade. As Garodnick says, the Lex line needs bigger platforms "with or without any rezoning."

Bloomberg has skimped on transit elsewhere, too. To save $500 million, he cut one of two planned stations with the city’s funding of the MTA’s extension of the No. 7 train, from Times Square to the far West Side. That decision doomed future commuters to long walks in the cold or heat.

Speaker Quinn should be in no hurry to rezone midtown. She should propose postponing the project for three years. That would give the current mayor and the next mayor time to fix the city’s budget so that New York can build underground before inviting developers to build above ground.

Bloomberg or his successor could pay for $400 million worth of transit improvements with just 17 days’ worth of spending on public workers’ health care benefits.

To paraphrase Bloomberg, if New York can’t do this now, it never will—which means we can’t afford more people in midtown later—not without condemning them to a miserable quality of life.

Original Source: http://www.cityandstateny.com/congestion-zoning/

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldn’t Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked “Ebola Czar” With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is Unclear­—Just As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494