Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Times Room for Debate

 

An End to the Inside Job?

February 12, 2013

By Nicole Gelinas

Mr. Lew, you held a top position at Citigroup from 2006 through 2008, the years when nation’s financial industry was careening toward crisis. In his recent book, "Bailout," Neil Barofsky, the former special inspector general of the government’s bank bailout program, writes that the "allure" of a high-paying private-sector job "is a powerful and pernicious force in government service, especially in agencies that deal with Wall Street." You surely remember that the former Clinton-era Treasury secretary, Robert Rubin, also landed at Citigroup. Is the revolving door between Washington and Wall Street a serious problem, and if so, what would you do about it in your agency?

If Citigroup were to fail tomorrow, can you say with confidence that you could counsel the Obama administration to allow Citigroup’s bondholders and other creditors, including derivatives counterparties, to take its losses in the marketplace, without a bailout? If not, in what circumstances wouldn’t this course be the best route?

More than two years after President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill into law, critics on the left and right have said it falls far short of fixing problems with the financial system. Derivatives rules, for example, are still not finalized, and there is no certainty on what would happen if a large insurance company like AIG failed, or is there? Do you think Dodd-Frank needs to be strengthened?

In the past few months, Spain and Italy have taken extraordinary steps to use taxpayer money to bail out investors in private banks. Does the U.S. government encourage such bailout policy or discourage it? If the former, is there a danger that Europe and the rest of the West would expect the U.S. to bail out its banks and other large financial institutions in a future crisis, just as Europe is doing now?

The Obama White House has done little to pressure mortgage servicers to reduce the amount that "underwater" homeowners owe on their home loans. Do you think it was fair for the U.S. government to bail out mortgage lenders and investors but not borrowers?

Original Source: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/02/11/questions-for-jack-lews-confirmation-hearings/do-wall-street-ties-impede-a-treasury-secretary

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

Reclaiming The American Dream IV: Reinventing Summer School
Howard Husock, 10-14-14

Don't Be Fooled, The Internet Is Already Taxed
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-14-14

Bad Pension Math Is Bad News For Taxpayers
Steven Malanga, 10-14-14

Proactive Policing Is Not 'Racial Profiling'
Heather Mac Donald, 10-13-14

Smartphones: The SUVs Of The Information Superhighway
Mark P. Mills, 10-13-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494