Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

Wall Street Journal

 

Bank Services Are Available to Those Who Want Them

March 06, 2012

By Nicole Gelinas

Meredith Whitney’s "America’s ’Unbanked’ Masses" (op-ed, Feb. 24) lamenting how new regulations have created "unbanked masses" features some muddy reasoning.

Ms. Whitney starts off stating that, "Fewer Americans have access to traditional banking services such as checking accounts, consumer loans and credit cards than they did five years ago." She offers no hard numbers, either on current absolutes or recent trends on this topic, saying only that a category of Americans numbering "one in four" seven years ago could number "one in three" in the unspecified "near future."

Just as deficiently, she never explains why she includes consumer loans and credit cards in the category of "traditional banking services" in the first place. Traditional banking is, er, traditionally speaking, checking and savings—that is, an account upon which you can draw for expenses and an account into which you can save.

Moreover, the examples she mentions in "consumer loans and credit cards" are aggressive even within these categories. She must be the only person in America, for example, who is worried that not enough people are taking out second mortgages or signing up for high-interest credit cards.

Leaving aside continued problems on the supply-side (lending), there are sound reasons for these pullbacks on the demand side (borrowing). Perhaps potential borrowers who have observed what has happened to house values in the past six years have realized that it is prudent to build equity up in their homes rather than tear it down, and perhaps people who have borrowed too much via revolving credit have decided not to borrow so much.

Nicole Gelinas

Manhattan Institute

New York

I am utterly confused. I have been repeatedly informed that greedy bankers spend much of their day overcharging the poor. Now, Ms. Whitney explains that the poor have no banking relationships at all. Of course, these very same bankers are to blame for this as well.

Original Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203753704577253832536195626.html?mod=ITP_opinion_1

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldn’t Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked “Ebola Czar” With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is Unclear­—Just As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494