Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Daily News

 

Who Is Gingrich?

January 22, 2012

By Ben Boychuk

GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich raised the ire of African-American voters recently when he vowed: “I will go to the NAACP convention, and explain to the African-American community why they should demand paychecks instead of food stamps.” Rather than apologize, though, he doubled down at a recent debate, asserting: “I’m going to continue to help poor people learn to get a job, learn to get a better job, and eventually learn to own the job.”

Is Gingrich an advocate for rugged self-reliance? Or is he making racist appeals to South Carolina’s Republican primary voters?


If Gingrich is choosing to be a “race hustler,” he’s playing like an amateur among seasoned professionals.

Jesse Jackson, of course, couldn’t wait to get in front of reporters to denounce what he called Gingrich’s “disdain for the poor.” Yet even Jackson couldn’t quite stay on message. Food stamps, Jackson explained to Politico’s M.J. Lee, “help farmers, they help the grocery industry, and mostly, they help people who are malnourished.”

This is a symptom of the very problem Gingrich is criticizing. Food stamps aren’t supposed to be an endless subsidy for “farmers” and “the grocery industry,” or even a lifelong program for the poor. The idea behind every safety net or anti-poverty program ever devised was to provide temporary assistance, not create self-perpetuating bureaucracies.

Partisans will fall over themselves making excuses -- and assigning blame -- for 45 million Americans receiving food stamps. The question we should be asking, as Gingrich seems to be, isn’t why all those people are on the food dole but how best to move them off of it.

When liberals aren’t reporting the racist “dog whistles” only they can hear, they are sharing their horror at the suggestion that the best thing government can do for people is to leave them alone. President Obama said so himself at a $1 million fundraiser last year, telling donors that if he loses in November, “then we’re going to have a government that tells the American people, `you are on your own.”’

If only. Truth is, Republicans are almost as meddlesome as Democrats.

But how little Obama and his supporters seem to think of their fellow Americans. Could we survive a week without a gargantuan welfare state to care for us? No charity or church would open its doors? We would simply descend into a Hobbesian nightmare -- solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short?

Tell me: Who’s supposed to be patronizing whom?

Original Source: http://www.dailynews.com/opinions/ci_19786300

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldn’t Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked “Ebola Czar” With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is Unclear­—Just As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494