Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Times Room for Debate

 

Factions Have a Role to Play

January 05, 2012

By Daniel DiSalvo

That the Republican Party is divided over its presidential nominee shouldn’t be all that surprising. America’s “big tent” parties are prone to factionalism because of the nature of our electoral system. Indeed, factions within the parties — think of Progressive Republicans in 1912, Southern Democrats at mid-century, and New Democrats in the 1990s — have often been as important in American political history as the parties themselves.

One way to look at the divisions within today’s Republican Party is to see them as based on ideological differences between neoconservatives, traditionalists, libertarians and the religious right. Each of these schools of thought points to different policy stands and leads voters to look for different traits in a presidential candidate. But differences at the level of political philosophy can be papered over by much agreement on practical particulars. It is really a matter of the degree of a candidate’s conservatism, which has been the central issue in the G.O.P. nomination contest so far.

Another way to look at the party is to see it as really divided in two — with a rump libertarian element personified by Ron Paul. On one side is a large “moderate” faction. It seeks a candidate who is prudent, has a sound temperament, and can win the general election. As Henry Olsen has argued in National Affairs, it is G.O.P. voters who see themselves as moderate conservatives who have been the core supporters of every Republican presidential nominee since Barry Goldwater. They tend to favor the candidate deemed “next in line.” This group has mainly supported Mitt Romney as “conservative enough.”

On the other side is a more conservative element, recently given popular expression by the Tea Party. To little avail, this slice of the party has bounced from Michele Bachmann to Rick Perry to Newt Gingrich and now to Rick Santorum, always in search of a viable candidate who is more conservative than Romney.

In spite of all this division, the best glue for any party is the opposing party. Many Republicans today may be unsure who they are for, but they are certain who they are against: Barack Obama. That sentiment is probably sufficient to unite the G.O.P. behind the eventual nominee. Ultimately, winner-take-all elections and the Electoral College are powerful forces that sustain our two-party system, factions and all.

Original Source: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/01/04/for-gop-one-party-but-three-platforms/factions-have-a-role-to-play

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

Reclaiming The American Dream IV: Reinventing Summer School
Howard Husock, 10-14-14

Don't Be Fooled, The Internet Is Already Taxed
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-14-14

Bad Pension Math Is Bad News For Taxpayers
Steven Malanga, 10-14-14

Proactive Policing Is Not 'Racial Profiling'
Heather Mac Donald, 10-13-14

Smartphones: The SUVs Of The Information Superhighway
Mark P. Mills, 10-13-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494