Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Times Room for Debate

 

More Revenue, More Spending

December 09, 2011

By E. J. McMahon

This week’s hurriedly enacted deal between Governor Cuomo and the Legislature means state income taxes will now return to the pre-2009 level for over 100,000 New Yorkers who have been subject to a temporary “millionaire tax,” even though they earn much less than $1 million. It will also save middle-class New Yorkers a little -- $5 to $10 a week or so for a typical family.

Unfortunately, the new law will also extend the top slice of New York’s biggest single income tax increase in 50 years, leaving the state tax burden on wealthier filers at its highest level since 1986.

For at least three more years, the top tax rate will be fixed at 8.82 percent on incomes of $1 million for individuals and $2 million for married couples filing joint returns. This is a hair below the now-expiring temporary top rate of 8.97 percent, but well above the permanent-law rate of 6.85 percent. Only two of New York’s economic peer states — fiscally troubled California and New Jersey — currently impose higher taxes on the wealthy. New York City residents in the newly established top bracket will pay 12.7 percent, the highest rate in the country.

Spun as job-creating “reform,” this was at bottom a raw revenue raiser. The state is extracting $2.6 billion from its top earners, redistributing $690 million to middle-income brackets, and earmarking another $400 million to upstate flood relief, a teen jobs program and a reduction in the special payroll tax created two years ago to subsidize mass transit in the New York region.

That leaves the governor with $1.5 billion to help fill a gap of $3.4 billion in the budget he must present next month. Absolutely nothing in this deal will reduce the unrelenting upward pressure on spending, at the state or local level.

There is, of course, a strong economic argument to be made against raising state and local taxes on footloose economic decision-makers. Mr. Cuomo himself was making that argument until very recently. But it doesn’t require a supply-side perspective to recognize the negative fiscal implications of this move.

The top 1 percent of income earners now pays 43 percent of New York’s state income tax, up from 25 percent in 1994. The state government will now be even more dependent on the highly volatile (and, since 2007, sharply decreased) incomes of a small number of filers who mainly live or work in New York City. In the long run, that will put the state’s finances -- and, by extension, those of New York City and the suburbs — on an even more precarious footing.

Original Source: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/12/08/cuomos-tax-deal-who-benefits-the-most/the-tax-deal-is-purely-a-revenue-raiser

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldnt Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked Ebola Czar With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is UnclearJust As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494