Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Times Economix Blog

 

How Washington Should Respond

November 16, 2011

By Josh Barro

It’s been challenging for Congress to respond to Occupy Wall Street’s concerns because it’s not entirely clear what the movement wants Congress to do. The protesters range from conventional liberals frustrated that the president’s agenda has been stymied, to hard-core anticapitalists, to (unfortunately) anarchists breaking shop windows in Oakland. It’s no surprise that elected officials have treaded lightly in responding.

That said, many Occupy protesters have voiced concerns that ought to be more prominent on Washington’s radar screen. Unemployment remains unacceptably high, and many Americans are drowning in debts like student loans and mortgages, which the economy has made more difficult to repay.

The Occupiers’ proposals to address these concerns have been sometimes absent and sometimes implausible. But there are a few concrete, politically viable changes that Washington could make that would address some problems that protesters have highlighted.

The most important would be to loosen monetary policy. A shift to nominal G.D.P. targeting, advocated by a vocal group of economists on the right and left, would result in a healthy near-term boost in inflation. This would help fix American balance sheets, because inflation reduces leverage — loans are in nominal dollars, so inflation reduces borrowers’ real debts. More importantly, such targeting would put people back to work and spur faster real economic growth.

Some Occupy protesters have made some outlandish and unproductive proposals on consumer lending, particularly in calling for widespread forgiveness of debts. That would undermine the financial system, but more targeted actions would be useful, including eliminating the special rules that make student debt nearly impossible to discharge in bankruptcy, and modifying mortgage loan balances as proposed by Luigi Zingales and Eric Posner.

Finally, Congress should adjust immigration policy to make it very easy for high-skilled immigrants to come and work in the United States. One of the main ways inequality is felt in America is through the sharply rising cost of health care and higher education, services that the middle class increasingly struggles to afford. Runaway inflation in these sectors is driven in part by the need to hire an ever-increasing number of professionals with scarce skills. Importing more doctors, nurses and professors would slow or even reverse inflation in these sectors, increasing the purchasing power of anybody who buys health care or education.

Original Source: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/11/16/does-congress-hear-occupy-wall-street/how-washington-should-respond

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

Reclaiming The American Dream IV: Reinventing Summer School
Howard Husock, 10-14-14

Don't Be Fooled, The Internet Is Already Taxed
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-14-14

Bad Pension Math Is Bad News For Taxpayers
Steven Malanga, 10-14-14

Proactive Policing Is Not 'Racial Profiling'
Heather Mac Donald, 10-13-14

Smartphones: The SUVs Of The Information Superhighway
Mark P. Mills, 10-13-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494