Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

Washington Examiner

 

Obama's CFPB Nominee Abused Private Attorney Contracting in Ohio

October 25, 2011

By James R. Copland

PRINTER FRIENDLY

Richard Cordray, President Obama’s nominee to head the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, has said he wants to use his new role to do “on a 50-state basis the things [he] cared most about as a state attorney general -- with a more robust and comprehensive authority.”

Such a statement is scary indeed given Cordray’s track record as Ohio’s attorney general.

After Cordray took over the Ohio attorney general’s office from Marc Dann, who resigned in scandal, many in the business community held out hope that the new state AG would clean up his predecessor’s practice of farming out the state’s lawsuits to his campaign contributors.

Instead, Cordray adopted the practice with gusto, parceling out at least six more lawsuits on a contingency-fee basis alleging that securities fraud had cost the state’s employee pension funds.

As a side effect of the federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, state employee pensions, the largest investors in the marketplace, largely control modern class-action litigation alleging securities fraud: Such funds have led suits resulting in 43 or more settlements in each of the last five years, totaling at least $2 billion annually.

Cordray sidestepped a then-existing Ohio law that forbade the state from entering into any contracts with a firm that had given over $2,000 to the campaign of an official with oversight of the contract in question by funneling contributions through the Ohio Democratic Party.

In that way, Cordray in a two-year span pulled in $830,000 from out-of-state plaintiffs’ firms, including $270,000 and $175,000, respectively, from the New York shareholder-class-action specialist firms Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann.

These and other firms in turn netted millions out of the more than $1 billion in settlement dollars negotiated with Wall firms in the wake of the financial crisis.

Although a still-existing executive order from the Bush era prohibits the federal government from entering into contingency-fee contracts with private attorneys, the CFPB’s open-ended authority, created under the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform, would otherwise afford Cordray vast powers to create work for his trial lawyer allies.

Cordray’s CFPB would be able to issue an array of rules and regulations that could spur more lawsuits, and he could gin up the value of private actions with sweeping subpoena powers -- think of former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer on steroids.

Moreover, whereas most federal agencies carefully balance power across bipartisan commissions with substantial congressional oversight, the CFPB director is answerable only to the president.

Apart from Cordray’s nomination, Dodd-Frank problematically delegates power to state AGs to enforce certain federal laws, including those against state and federally chartered banks.

Similar provisions “deputizing” state AGs to enforce federal laws are now being inserted regularly into federal laws by the litigation industry’s friends in Congress.

Such state AG-delegation rules turn federalism perversely on its head by giving federal regulatory authority, in effect, to the most aggressive state AG in the nation, who can hoist his regulatory views on the citizens of the other 49 states in the union.

Worse, such rules might be used by some state AGs to turn federal regulation over to the same avaricious trial lawyers who so regularly gobble up their state-law litigation dockets.

To prevent such abuses, the Obama administration should clarify that the executive order against contingency-fee contracting applies to all state enforcement actions deriving from federal law.

Better still, Congress should rethink its practice, in Dodd-Frank and elsewhere, of turning over federal regulation to state AGs in the first place. Finally, the Senate should not accept Obama’s nomination of Cordray without substantial questioning and scrutiny -- and without reforming the CFPB structure to make its leadership more accountable.

Original Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/10/obamas-cfpb-nominee-abused-private-attorney-contracting-ohio

 

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494