Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Times Room for Debate

 

Have Regulations Hurt Bank Profits?

October 19, 2011

By Nicole Gelinas

If recent rules have brought Wall Street revenue back down to earth, is that healthy or a sign of heavy-handed regulation?


Sure, new fees and regulations -- some necessary and some not -- will shrink bank profits. But what should shrink bank profits is the free market doing what it is supposed to do: cut a bloated industry down to size.

The financial industry has grown too quickly for more than 25 years. Between the early 1980s and 2007, financial-industry profits more than quadrupled as a share of the nation’s income. Why the financial industry enjoyed this growth is no great mystery. Beginning in the early ’80s, Washington treated the financial industry’s big lenders -- global bondholders -- as a class of investors immune from losses. The phrase “too big to fail” entered the financial press lexicon.

Subsidize corn production, and you get more corn. Subsidize lending to the financial industry, as America has done via its “too big to fail” guarantees, and you get more financial industry -- whether you need more of it or not. In turn, over the past two and a half decades, we got more American indebtedness, as financial firms turned around and lent their own cheaply borrowed money to the American home “owner” and consumer via ever more complex structures.

The best way to shrink Wall Street is to let the markets do it. If the government made it clear that it won’t bail out financial firms’ bondholders and derivatives partners, these bondholders and partners would think twice about putting their money on the line with black-box financial firms.

The only way to stand by a “no bailouts” pledge is to make sure that financial firms can fail without bringing down the entire economy. That means regulating derivatives and consistently limiting borrowing.

America hasn’t accomplished these goals, as this Dealbook article points out. More than three years after TARP, despite new caps on some bank fees, we have no idea what bank profits will look like one year β€” or five years β€” from now. Such a projection would depend on predicting not how much banking the nation actually needs β€” and at what price β€” but on predicting government whim.

The situation is not good for the economy. It’s not good for the banks, either, in the long run, as people fed up with the lack of market discipline for banks take matters into their own hands.

Original Source: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/10/19/have-regulations-hurt-bank-profits/bank-profits-are-shrinking-as-they-should

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

Charter Center Advertises for More English Language Learners
Eliza Shapiro, 10-09-14

What the FDA Won’t Let Your Doctor Know Can Kill You
Paul Howard, 10-08-14

Reclaiming the American Dream III: The CT Yankee Saving Kids In Southern Ohio
Howard Husock, 10-07-14

Federal Employees Spent 3.4 Million Hours Working For Their Unions
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-07-14

Why Charters Serve Fewer English Learners
Marcus A. Winters, 10-06-14

Creator Of Chart Of Doom Defends Chart Badly And Casts Aspersions
Scott Winship, 10-06-14

Initiative Reform Doesn't Fix The Real Problem
Ben Boychuk, 10-04-14

The Inequality Non-Explainer, Explained
Scott Winship, 10-03-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494