Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

National Review Online

 

Re: Romney and Taxes

October 12, 2011

By Nicole Gelinas

Ramesh: I agree that Romney did not give a good answer. But I think that the tax plan in question is good.

Why kill capital-gains taxes for the middle class? (Romney would also eliminate dividends and interest taxes for people making under $200,000 annually — p. 41.)

Americans need to save and invest more than they do, and they need to invest more in something other than their houses. But right now, the reward for investing in the stock market (or, say, buying a bond) is a slew of complicated tax calculations. The tax forms are more painful than the taxes themselves. Romney’s desire to get rid of this regulatory punishment of middle-class investment outweighs his artless answer.

Why not kill the same taxes for wealthier taxpayers, too, as Gingrich asked? Because it would amount, on the campaign trail, to a plan for slashing incoming taxes on the rich. If Romney were to go that route, he’d run up against the criticism that he’s rewarding people who make most of their income from capital at the expense of people who make most of their money from labor.

Romney already has to run against the perception that Bain Capital cut jobs at companies it controlled in order to eke out capital profits. What would be an abstract risk for others would be a concrete peril for him.

Broader tax reform would be lovely. In the meantime, though, Romney’s proposal to encourage more middle-class people to invest in stocks and bonds rather than in houses is sound, economically and politically.

Original Source: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/279936/re-romney-and-taxes-nicole-gelinas

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldn’t Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked “Ebola Czar” With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is Unclear­—Just As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494