Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

Washington Examiner

 

Then There Were Those Who Didn't Riot In London

July 31, 2011

By Nicole Gelinas

To skim London’s newspapers earlier this month was to think that the city was consumed by mayhem. But an afternoon at London’s summer attraction -- the Royal Wedding Dress at Buckingham Palace -- is a fairer exhibit of reality than were the riots alone.

“Kate’s dress,” as it’s called, is the gown that Catherine Middleton wore in April to marry Prince William. To capitalize on global interest in the wedding, the queen has put the dress on display in her state rooms, open -- for a $30 fee -- until October.

Kate’s dress reflects traditional British qualities: controlled creativity and pride of craftsmanship. Designer Sarah Burton made a garment in the style of the late Alexander McQueen, yet the gown is signature Kate, too.

The dress seems form-fitting, yet it defined rather than revealed. Thanks to artificial boning and padding, plus the distraction of intricate English lace, the only flesh-and-blood Kate that the wedding audience saw were her hands and a modest sliver leading to the neck and face. Kate remained confidently private.

Listen to the British women in the Buckingham crowd, and you can appreciate the dance that Kate must perform with her admirers and critics. She must give them enough of herself but not too much. “She’s so slender,” says one woman. “She got lucky up top,” says her companion.

Kate’s wedding shoes, also on display, are a shock of personal viscera in a way the dress isn’t, quite. The shoes are worn, if gently, used by a real person on a jitter-inducing day.

The audience for the dress is global. Tickets are sold out until Sept. 6.

Visitors absorb the symbolism: Marriage is important, as are order and protocol. These constants are the trademarks of the spiffed-up monarchy, on view outside the palace every other morning during the changing of the guard.

No country or city is failing if it can persuade millions of tourists to spend their finite dollars and time experiencing its history. The tourists are relentless: each day, the geese in St. James’s Park are fed by people speaking every language on the planet.

Outside Buckingham Palace, London is still London. On a weekend night, girls celebrating a “hen party” -- a bachelorette party, that is -- stand outside a Piccadilly club, sporting distinctive headbands. “Are you aware that you have penises in your hair?” asks a policeman. “Are you going to wear those on the big day?”

One afternoon, two girls in full face and body niqabs and abayas -- Muslim garb -- laugh and find their balance, hand in hand, as they disembark from a nausea-inducing ride at the temporary fun fair beside the London Eye Ferris wheel.

The violence and thuggery of two weeks before, which led to four deaths, twice the number of British tourists murdered in Florida in April after ending up in the wrong neighborhood, were horrific. But the riots got so much attention because they were an aberration.

London, relative to the rest of the planet, is still a beacon of First World order, culture and business. This is a city with a murder rate one-fourth of New York City’s, and the lowest in 33 years.

Ordinary citizens have aided their neighbors throughout the country. One riot victim in Birmingham, Indian-born store owner Ajay Bhatia, celebrated his new British citizenship as he was cleaning up the mess that looters left.

“The community here has rallied around me in a way I did not think was possible,” he told Prince William when the prince came to visit. “I love this country. I don’t feel ashamed. I feel proud.”

London isn’t perfect -- and it bears a special burden because the world depends on it to maintain its success.

Original Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/08/manhattan-moment-then-there-were-those-who-didnt-riot-london

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

‘Afroducking’ The Law: Deadly Excuses For Endangering Others
Nicole Gelinas, 11-17-14

2014’s Most Encouraging Democratic Victory
Daniel DiSalvo, 11-14-14

Bring Deferred Prosecution Agreements Out Of The Shadows
James R. Copland, 11-12-14

Coal Trumps IPCC, Again
Robert Bryce, 11-12-14

World Leaders, Ignore Obama And Do These Five Things Instead
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 11-12-14

ACA Architect: ‘The Stupidity Of The American Voter’ Led Us To Hide ACA Costs
Avik Roy, 11-11-14

Cancer Drug Prices: A Convenient Scapegoat for a Complex Problem
Paul Howard, 11-11-14

A Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Obamacare
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 11-11-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494