Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

Washington Examiner

 

Cutting The 'Food Desert' Myth Down To Size

July 20, 2011

By David Gratzer

Policymakers are scrambling to find a solution to our growing waistlines. Some are targeting America’s “food deserts” -- areas lacking in grocery stores.

As first lady Michelle Obama explained last March, “families wind up buying their groceries at the local gas station or convenience store, places that offer few, if any, healthy options.”

In the war against obesity, irrigating the food desert has become a priority. From New York to Chicago to L.A., it’s become a focus of city initiatives, and the federal budget earmarks nearly $400 million to eliminate the problem.

There’s just one catch: The problem is badly overstated.

At first blush, the food-desert argument sounds compelling. Because of a market failure, grocers in rural areas and low-income inner cities simply won’t stock enough fresh food for healthy diets, forcing people to eat high-calorie foods.

But this argument makes it too easy to sidestep the role of personal responsibility and blame scapegoats for the nation’s rising obesity rate. Call it the McVictim Syndrome. Our obsession with food deserts, alas, is a symptom of it.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture defines a food desert as a low-income census tract where a large number of residents are more than a mile from a grocery store.

By this definition, 13.5 million Americans are supposedly McVictimized by food deserts. That’s less than 4.5 percent of the U.S. population, yet roughly two-thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

You don’t need a Ph.D. in mathematics to understand that food deserts are, at best, a very small aspect of a vast problem.

A few months ago, the USDA released a glitzy online map charting the location of every food desert in America. Urbanist blogger Angie Schmitt was baffled to find her home at the edge of a Cleveland food desert, even though she’s “never had better access to food in [her] life.”

The explanation: She lives near a successful, family-run grocery. But the USDA bureaucracy defines “access to fresh food” as access to a large supermarket with more than $2 million in annual sales.

Neighborhood bodegas? Family grocers? Produce markets? None of them count, whether they stock fresh food or not.

The issue is almost surely more complicated than food-desert experts claim. In a major new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, involving more than 5,000 people in low-income Birmingham, Ala., Minneapolis, Chicago and Oakland, Calf., and spanning 15 years, no connection was found between access to grocery stores and better diet.

Obesity is driving public and private health care costs higher. But if we’re going to fight obesity, we need a thoughtful approach, not a politically correct one.

Fortunately, there are some hopeful signs. In March, the Journal of Public Health published a paper reviewing the success of a British pilot program.

This “Pounds for Pounds” study used cash incentives to reward healthy weight reduction -- a cheap strategy, since it’s really about sharing the savings that come from reduced health costs.

Over 44 percent of participants completed the program with “clinically significant weight loss.” American public and private insurers should be inspired to use similar strategies.

In Oklahoma City, participants in Mayor Mick Cornett’s voluntary campaign to “Put this City on a Diet” reported they’d shed 750,000 pounds as of the summer. Yet Oklahoma City is covered in food deserts, according to the USDA map.

And in Newark, N.J., vegetarian Mayor Cory Booker dropped nearly 40 pounds this year as part of his personal campaign to inspire residents to do the same. The presence of a giant food desert on Newark’s coastline doesn’t seem to have slowed him down.

Original Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/07/manhattan-moment-cutting-food-desert-myth-down-size

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

Reclaiming The American Dream IV: Reinventing Summer School
Howard Husock, 10-14-14

Don't Be Fooled, The Internet Is Already Taxed
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-14-14

Bad Pension Math Is Bad News For Taxpayers
Steven Malanga, 10-14-14

Proactive Policing Is Not 'Racial Profiling'
Heather Mac Donald, 10-13-14

Smartphones: The SUVs Of The Information Superhighway
Mark P. Mills, 10-13-14

Failing The Subways -- On Track For Debt And Decay
Nicole Gelinas, 10-13-14

The Free Speech Movement Won, But Free Speech Lost
Sol Stern, 10-12-14

Book Review: 'Breaking In' By Joan Biskupic
Kay S. Hymowitz, 10-10-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494