Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Times Room for Debate

 

Imperfect, but Useful

September 07, 2010

By Marcus A. Winters

What are the benefits and pitfalls of using student test scores to measure a teacher’s effectiveness?

As a statistical tool, “value-added” assessment is not a perfect measure of teacher quality. Indeed, there will never be a perfect measure of teacher quality. The real question, then, is whether this analysis can improve the methods we use to evaluate teacher performance. There is ample reason to believe that it can.

An objective measure of what an individual teacher adds to a student’s proficiency.

Currently, nearly all teachers are rated satisfactory or higher. No one honestly believes that this system accurately assesses teacher quality. Uniform satisfactory ratings are inconsistent with empirical research showing wide variation in teacher quality, and they defy common sense.

When evaluating teacher quality, what we really want to know is: To what extent does an individual teacher contribute to her student’s proficiency? Value-added test-score analysis provides us with an objective estimate of this contribution.

It is true that the test-score analysis doesn’t tell us everything we want to know about a teacher. For example, if a teacher is performing poorly, it can’t tell us why. Also, random error ensures some teachers will receive ratings that over- or underestimate their actual influence on student proficiency. For those and other compelling reasons, it would be irresponsible to use only value-added analysis to evaluate teachers.

Nonetheless, imperfect value-added assessment is surely an improvement upon the current system, which makes no meaningful attempt to differentiate teachers by their effectiveness. Further, recent empirical research finds evidence that value-added measures of a teacher’s past performance are far better predictors of her future students’ achievement than are other observed characteristics, like her credentials and years of experience.

Everyone agrees that teacher quality is crucial for student learning. It’s well past time that public schools took seriously the job of identifying it. Value-added assessment is an important and powerful tool that public schools should make use of to ensure that the most effective teachers are educating our kids .

Original Source: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2010/09/06/assessing-a-teachers-value/value-added-assessments-are-imperfect-but-useful

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

‘Afroducking’ The Law: Deadly Excuses For Endangering Others
Nicole Gelinas, 11-17-14

2014’s Most Encouraging Democratic Victory
Daniel DiSalvo, 11-14-14

Bring Deferred Prosecution Agreements Out Of The Shadows
James R. Copland, 11-12-14

Coal Trumps IPCC, Again
Robert Bryce, 11-12-14

World Leaders, Ignore Obama And Do These Five Things Instead
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 11-12-14

ACA Architect: ‘The Stupidity Of The American Voter’ Led Us To Hide ACA Costs
Avik Roy, 11-11-14

Cancer Drug Prices: A Convenient Scapegoat for a Complex Problem
Paul Howard, 11-11-14

A Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Obamacare
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 11-11-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494