Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

Washington Examiner

 

Making Second Chance Act Work For More Former Prisoners

July 28, 2010

By Howard Husock

Last week, the same day that the Senate Judiciary Committee began considering whether and how to extent the Second Chance Act -- designed to better the odds that the 700,000 prisoners released annually will not wind up back behind bars -- the Justice Department’s inspector general released a pointed reminder about the limits of the program’s good intentions.

Even as Congress considers spending more, the IG found that the Justice Department had not devised any good way to monitor $100 million-plus already spent to know whether it’s done anything to reduce the sobering U.S. rate of recidivism. Forty-four percent of those released are rearrested within just the first year.

The scale of the problem, coupled with that lack of good evaluations, makes it imperative for Congress, in reauthorizing the act first passed in the Bush administration, to give priority to “re-entry” programs, which are showing some real promise -- programs which emphasize employment.

Just as welfare-to-work has shown good results -- cutting the number of households on public assistance from more than 5 million to fewer than 2 million -- so, too, can prison-to-work.

The revolving door that sees those released from prison soon return is a problem in many dimensions. It’s a budget problem as states struggle to control the costs of prisons. It’s a public safety problem, especially for our cities, when those released are drawn back into a criminal life.

And it’s a family crisis: An estimated 55 percent of state prison inmates are parents -- most often the absent fathers who, if they were to change their lives, could be the good example that young boys, especially, so often need.

That’s what makes it so important to show success by a “rapid attachment to work.” The premise: to steer those released toward a job -- almost any job -- in the crucial first weeks when they will be tempted to return to crime.

Despite the down economy, the Prisoner Reentry Initiative started by Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker (who notes how often he is personally approached by ex-offenders who ask for jobs more than anything else) has used a combination of federal funds and private philanthropy to place some 58 percent of the 1,051 program participants. To date they have been placed in jobs with an hourly wage of more than $9 per hour -- in construction, food service, sanitation, supermarkets.

What’s more, after more than a year, only 8 percent of all participants have been rearrested. At the same time, crime in Newark has been steadily falling.

Newark is not alone. A Harvard evaluation of New York’s Ready, Willing & Able program, which centers on public service employment and sobriety, found that “three years after prison release, RWA clients have 30 percent fewer arrests than a comparison group matched by demographics and criminal history.”

Low recidivism rates also characterized the Ready4Work program, a national employment-centered demonstration project that operated in 17 cities from 2003 through 2006. It was found to have reduced recidivism by 34 percent to 50 percent below national averages.

To date, however, the Second Chance Act has been unfocused, more like a grab bag of assistance -- substance abuse, housing, mentoring and more. An estimated 60 percent of Second Chance’s demonstration programs were programs not focused on work. It should instead send a message to the state and local governments that will always spend the most on corrections, parole and re-entry: Put work first.

Original Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Making-Second-Chance-Act-work-for-more-former-prisoners-1004120-99347129.html

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldn’t Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked “Ebola Czar” With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is Unclear­—Just As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494