Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

RealClearMarkets

 

The Goldman Deal: Adults Living Dangerously

April 21, 2010

By Steven Malanga

There’s an old cliché about investing which holds that every transaction, even the sale of a single share of stock on a regulated exchange, has a winner and a loser. When you buy that share you’re obviously betting it will rise, and whoever sold it is figuring that it will fall.

Most small-time investors don’t see the market in such starkly zero-sum terms. But sophisticated players surely understand that is what much of investing is about, especially with complicated products like credit default swaps that explicitly let you place bets for or against a market.

It’s difficult to know at this point whether Goldman Sachs was a winner or a loser in the now infamous Abacus 2007-AC1 collateralized debt obligation that is at the heart of Securities and Exchange Commission accusations of fraud by the investment bank. The SEC claims that Goldman didn’t tell two big investment players who bet on the upside of the housing market through Abacus that hedge-fund operator John Paulson, who was shorting the market, had a hand in selecting the portfolio for the deal.

There’s an old cliché about investing which holds that every transaction, even the sale of a single share of stock on a regulated exchange, has a winner and a loser. When you buy that share you’re obviously betting it will rise, and whoever sold it is figuring that it will fall.

Most small-time investors don’t see the market in such starkly zero-sum terms. But sophisticated players surely understand that is what much of investing is about, especially with complicated products like credit default swaps that explicitly let you place bets for or against a market.

It’s difficult to know at this point whether Goldman Sachs was a winner or a loser in the now infamous Abacus 2007-AC1 collateralized debt obligation that is at the heart of Securities and Exchange Commission accusations of fraud by the investment bank. The SEC claims that Goldman didn’t tell two big investment players who bet on the upside of the housing market through Abacus that hedge-fund operator John Paulson, who was shorting the market, had a hand in selecting the portfolio for the deal.

Original Source: http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2010/04/21/the_goldman_deal_adults_living_dangerously_98429.html

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

Unemployment Is Dropping, Thanks To A Republican Policy That Obama Opposed
Avik Roy, 03-02-15

Paying For Retirees' Health Bills, Smartly
E. J. McMahon, 02-27-15

The Veterans Independence Act: Giving Vets A Way Out Of Socialized Medicine
Avik Roy, 02-26-15

A Navy Seal's PTSD RX: The Great Books
Howard Husock, 02-26-15

Budget Wars Threaten Basic Science And Future Innovation?
Mark P. Mills, 02-25-15

Why Eric Holder Won't Let Go Of Ferguson
Jason L. Riley, 02-24-15

Affordable For Whom: How Robust Is De Blasio's Housing Plan?
Nicole Gelinas, 02-24-15

DC Streetcars Don't Just Combust --- They Also Congest
Alex Armlovich, 02-23-15

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2015 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494