Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

Washington Examiner

 

Give Up Abortion for Nationalized Health Care?

November 18, 2009

By Josh Barro

Throughout the health care debate, Democrats and President Obama have insisted that Americans who want to maintain their current health care coverage will be able do so. Reform, Democrats argued, would be a win-win, extending coverage to millions of uninsured Americans while depriving nobody of existing coverage they like.

But events this month have forced liberals to admit an inconvenient truth: Not only will health care reform force millions of Americans to change health insurance plans against their will, but those shifts could also cause millions of women to lose coverage for abortion.

The elephant in the room is the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, adopted by the House just before the passage of the Affordable Health Care for America Act. Stupak-Pitts would prohibit any taxpayer-subsidized health plan from covering elective abortions.

This restriction is far-reaching, because most Americans will qualify for subsidized health insurance if they don’t get coverage through their employers. As a result, a large majority of policies sold through the new federal insurance exchange would be subsidized and few or none would cover abortion.

If Obama is right and everyone with existing coverage can keep it, then passionate proponents of abortion access have little to worry about. Most Americans are already covered by employer-based plans, which the amendment generally shouldn’t affect -- the exchange will mostly sell individual policies.

If the exchange mostly caters to people who currently lack health insurance altogether, there’s little reason to worry about reduced access to abortion.

But what if Obama is wrong, and people with existing abortion-inclusive insurance are moved, against their will, into exchange-traded plans that cannot cover abortion? Some businesses might find it’s cheaper to drop insurance coverage and let their employees buy federally subsidized insurance.

Others will be allowed to buy into the exchange directly, replacing their existing plans with new ones that exclude abortion. If these trends become widespread, Stupak-Pitts could cause millions of American women to lose the abortion coverage they currently get through their employers.

Prior to Stupak-Pitts, concerns that health reform would lead firms to change or drop health coverage were mostly voiced on the right. But last week on the blog of the Center for American Progress, a staffer warned that millions of Americans might lose their existing employer-provided abortion coverage, as employers start buying insurance through the exchange.

Liberal critics of Stupak-Pitts are just admitting the obvious about health care reform. Employer-based health insurance is a legacy of tax subsidies that apply to employer-provided insurance but not individually purchased insurance.

Any system that adds subsidies for other purchase channels will reduce the portion of Americans with employer-based coverage -- and subject more Americans to whatever restrictions the government places on policies that are sold through the exchange. Now the left is realizing that some of those restrictions may be ones they do not find desirable.

Stupak-Pitts has forced liberals to admit that reform is not a win for everyone. For reform proponents, this may be an acceptable tradeoff: Extending health insurance to tens of millions of Americans who currently lack coverage is an important achievement that must be weighed against the costs of reform.

Now they must consider what losses they will accept on the road to universal coverage.

Original Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Manhattan-Moment/Give-up-abortion-for-nationalized-health-care_-8547294-70296657.html

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

Reclaiming The American Dream IV: Reinventing Summer School
Howard Husock, 10-14-14

Don't Be Fooled, The Internet Is Already Taxed
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-14-14

Bad Pension Math Is Bad News For Taxpayers
Steven Malanga, 10-14-14

Proactive Policing Is Not 'Racial Profiling'
Heather Mac Donald, 10-13-14

Smartphones: The SUVs Of The Information Superhighway
Mark P. Mills, 10-13-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494