Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

Front Page Magazine

 

A Trojan Skunk

July 23, 2009

By David Gratzer

People are used to taking a leap of faith. With President Obama’s health-care reforms, they take a leap of ideology. How else to explain the mad rush by the President and Congress to pass a “public health insurance option” that remains a mystery even to its most committed supporters?

Of course, even in the absence of details, the endorsements for the public option — the centerpiece of the Democrats’ health reform proposal that would establish a Medicare-style government-run insurance to compete with private insurance plans — were unconditional.

Last year, American Prospect’s Paul Waldman declared the public option “a beautiful jewel” of health reform despite the fact that no one could actually describe the color, cut, or price of this stone. In the Washington Post, blogger Ezra Klein wrote in early June that a “strong” public insurance option was “the single most recognizable marker for victory,” even as he acknowledged that there were three very different “flavors” of public insurance under consideration. And, earlier this month, The Nation raised the bar, editorializing that “a public option is needed — but it is by no means sufficient.”

And liberal blogs are littered with endorsements like “if you don’t like the public option, get the hell out of the way.”

With such breathless enthusiasm and presidential backing, it’s no surprise that almost three quarters of Americans polled support the idea, even if less than a third actually want to use it.

Some warn that the public option could well be a Trojan horse for government-run health care. After all, the incremental growth of public insurance was the foundation for socialized medicine in countries like Canada.

But for all we knew, it might have been better to call it a Trojan duck, or perhaps a Trojan bear. Until last Tuesday, few people on either side of the Beltway could be sure about the size, shape, or color of the beast in question — Democrats, after all, hadn’t produced a meaningful draft bill in the House; Senator Max Baucus is still flushing out details in the Senate. A consulting firm with long experience reviewing the government plan likened costing its economic impact to “nailing jell-o to the wall” because even the broadest details hadn’t been settled by anyone, anywhere.

No one could be sure whether it would follow state laws and mandates. No one could be sure how it would be governed. No one could be sure whether the plan would arbitrarily set prices as Medicare does, or negotiate them the way the private sector does. No one could be sure whether the public plan would be subsidized by government or financed the way insurance plans are, despite the stated goal of “honest competition.”

Well, now we know — sort of. Last Tuesday, the House released draft legislation that includes a public health care insurance option. We can safely describe the Trojan horse as... a Trojan skunk.

It will curl up and release noxious gases, but only if attacked — just as public plans around the world have fought health inflation by rationing services, denying care, and leaving patients holding their noses in disgust. It’s a scavenger, since it will likely attract patients and businesses because it isn’t bound by market pricing or state taxes, giving it a competitive advantage over private plans. And, just as a skunk’s black and white stripes act as camouflage, the public option will confuse voters. Some will think they’re looking at an insurance fund, financed by “premiums;” others will assume it’s a government program, financed on a pay-as-you-go basis. (For the record, the House bill falls somewhere in between, calling for some, but not much, capitalization — which sounds like Fannie Mae.)

Of course, it’s still too early to fully judge. After all, at press time, Congressional leaders have endorsed the skunk, before they’ve even figured out how to finance the subsidies built into the overall plan. We’re still waiting on the Senate bill. So in a few days, the public option could look more like a Trojan donkey, a snake, or an elephant.

And, until Congress flushes out those details, Americans deserve better. The President suggests that the time for action is now. Let’s put the rhetoric aside, Mr. President, and have a real debate with real details, now.

Original Source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35674

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

The Real Challenge When Police Use Lethal Force
Stephen Eide, 12-15-14

Why Cops Need To Sweat The ‘Small Stuff’
Nicole Gelinas, 12-08-14

A Bill To Loosen Police Discipline
E. J. McMahon, 12-08-14

More Subsidies For Big Wind
Robert Bryce, 12-08-14

Bill Slanders His Cops
Heather Mac Donald, 12-07-14

What The Numbers Say On Police Use Of Force
Steven Malanga, 12-04-14

Detroit's Bankruptcy and Its Painful Reforms
Stephen Eide, 12-04-14

The EPA Pours On The Pain With New Ozone Regulations
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 12-03-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494