In a Nov. 8 Op-Ed article about Mexican interference in U.S. domestic affairs, the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo was misspelled as Guadeloupe-Hidalgo.
DIPLOMACY MAY BE the art of lying for ones country, but Mexican diplomacy requires taking that art to virtuosic heights. Sitting in his expansive office in Mexicos Los Angeles consulate, Deputy Consul General Mario Velazquez-Suarez insists that he and his peers do not interfere in U.S. internal affairs, including immigration matters. “Immigration is an internal discussion,” he says.
But its not quite true. Mexican officials here and abroad interfere almost daily in U.S. sovereignty.
The meddling starts with Mexicos comic book-style guide to breaching the border safely and evading detection once across. The Foreign Ministry distributes this “Guia del Migrante Mexicano” (“Guide for the Mexican Migrant”) in Mexico; consulates along the border hand it out in the United States.
The guide does briefly remind readers that “mechanisms for legal entry” into the U.S. exist and are the surest way to get in. But the book primarily consists of “practical advice” for entering illegally: Cross when the heat is lowest; dont wear heavy clothing when fording a river; do keep your coyote in sight; dont send your children across the border with strangers.
The guides recommendations on how to avoid detection once here are equally no-nonsense: Do keep your daily routines stable, to avoid calling attention to yourself; dont engage in domestic violence -- the Marvel comic-type illustration shows a macho man, biceps bulging, socking a woman in the jaw.
Consulates exist to promote the commercial interests of their nations abroad and to help nationals if they have lost passports, been robbed or fallen ill. They are not supposed to connive at breaking a host countrys laws.
Assisted border-breaking is just the tip of the iceberg.
Mexican consulates, like those of other countries, have traditionally offered consular cards to their nationals for registration purposes. But after 9/11, consulates began to promote the card as a way for illegals to obtain privileges that the U.S. usually reserves for legal residents.
Consulates aggressively lobbied U.S. governmental officials and banks to accept the matriculas consular as valid IDs for drivers licenses, checking accounts and other privileges. Only illegals need this identification -- legal aliens already have sufficient documentation to get drivers licenses or bank accounts.
The matriculas flew off the shelf -- more than 4.7 million have been issued since 2000. Every day, illegals seeking matriculas swamp the consulates. Though a consulates right to issue such a card is indisputable, Mexico is pushing the envelope when it lobbies governments to accept the card as an official ID.
Mexican consuls routinely denounce U.S. law enforcement efforts against illegal immigration as biased and inhumane. For instance, when the U.S. Border Patrol arrested a group of undocumented aliens near the San Diego consulate (en route, naturally, to pick up matriculas), the Mexican consul general objected. Mexicos Foreign Ministry said the arrests violated a “gentlemans agreement” that its consulates could carry out their duties without the presence of law enforcement -- in other words, outside the ambit of U.S. law.
Back in Mexico, politicians blast any hint that U.S. legislators might obstruct illegals free pass. In May, the U.S. Congress passed the Real ID Act, which rendered drivers licenses issued to illegal aliens inadmissible for aircraft boarding and at other federal security checkpoints. Then-Mexican Interior Minister Santiago Creel lashed out. The law, he said, is “absurd; it is not understandable in light of any criteria.”
In fact, the law was quite understandable. After 9/11, Congress wanted to make sure that federal authorities had properly vetted aliens given access to sensitive areas, such as airplanes.
The gall of Mexican officials goes further. After pressing us to educate Mexicos citizens, give them food stamps, deliver their babies, provide them with hospital beds and police their neighborhoods, the Mexican government also expects us to help preserve their loyalty -- to Mexico.
Each of Mexicos 47 consulates in the U.S. has a mandate to introduce Mexican textbooks into schools with significant Hispanic populations. The Mexican Consulate in L.A. showered nearly 100,000 textbooks on 1,500 schools in the L.A. Unified School District this year alone.
“If people are living in the U.S., of course they need to become excellent citizens of this place,” said Mireya Magana Galvez, a press attache with the L.A. consulate. “If we can help in their education, they will understand better.”
The Mexican sixth-grade history book celebrates the troops who fought the Americans during the Mexican-American War. But “all the sacrifices and heroism of the Mexican people were useless,” recounts the chronicle. The “Mexican people saw the enemy flag wave at the National Palace.” The wars consequences were “disastrous,” notes the primer: “To end the occupation, Mexico was obligated to sign the treaty of Guadeloupe-Hidalgo,” by which the country lost half its territory to the U.S.
This narrative is accurate and rather tame by Mexicos usual anti-American standards. But a student in the U.S. could easily find himself confused about his allegiances. Is his country Mexico or the U.S.? Study exercises that include discovering “what happened to your territory when the U.S. invaded” dont clarify things. The textbook concludes by celebrating Mexican patriotic symbols: the flag, the currency and the national anthem.
The Bush administration winks at such Mexican intrusions with the same insouciance with which it refuses to enforce the immigration laws. The result: an immigration policy that often appears to emanate as much from Mexico City as from Washington.
Original Source: http://articles.latimes.com/2005/nov/08/opinion/oe-macdonald8