Until this year, skid row presented a scene of squalor and depravity that had no equal across the country. Sidewalks were impassable, covered with bodies, human waste and infectious bacteria. Makeshift tents and cardboard-box encampments lined the streets. Prostitution and drug use and trafficking were open and shameless.
Even addicts were amazed at the scene. Fifty-year-old Vicki Williams arrived from Las Vegas in December 2005 with a heavy habit. “I couldnt believe what I was seeing,” she said. “People getting high on the streets like it was legal. Anything you can imagine, Ive observed: Women walking down the street buck naked; people stabbed in front of me.”
Employees of the areas export-import businesses and food-processing plants often had to step around feces, discarded hypodermic needles and hostile encampment residents in order to enter their workplaces.
Yet for 25 years, homeless advocates and civil liberties groups fought every effort to restore sanity to the 50-square-block area. Any time the police embarked on a law enforcement campaign, anti-police litigators hauled the LAPD into court. In 1999, the doyenne of downtown homeless agitators, Alice Callaghan, picketed the opening of a skid row drop-in center intended to provide the homeless a path to rehabilitation. Callaghan likened the facility to an internment camp. Officers who tried to get mentally ill, diseased addicts into treatment were accused of harassing the homeless. It was hard not to conclude that the advocates wanted the homeless to stay maximally visible.
Now, the situation has changed. The Los Angeles Police Departments Safer City Initiativeunder which 50 additional police officers were assigned to the neighborhood to reduce crime, fight drug dealing and crack down on quality-of-life offenseshas begun to bring safety and assistance to people living on the streets and in the SROs and missions. The number of people sleeping on downtown streets declined from a peak of 1,876 in mid-September 2006 to just over 700 in recent months, according to police. “Weve broken the back of the problem,” says LAPD Chief William J. Bratton.
Yet the homeless industry and lawyers who specialize in taking on the LAPD continue to attack the initiative as a cruel effort to punish the poor. This charge is a grotesque misrepresentation of what is really happening, a mythology that is utterly unsupported by the facts.
Myth: The police are criminalizing homelessness and poverty. Reality: The police are targeting crime.
Before the Safer City Initiative began, skid row was a place of ruthless predation and violence. In May 2006, for example, a mentally ill woman who had repeatedly resisted offers of housing and services was stomped to death by a homeless parolee. Every time addicts trying to break their habit stepped outside, they entered a drug carnival of shameless proportions. Dealers fought for control of turf and terrorized the elderly.
In recent months, under Safer City, that atmosphere has been changing. During the first half of 2007, there were 241 fewer victims of violent crime in skid row, and over 12 months, serious crime dropped by 32%.
Most skid row arrests result from aggravated assaults and drug traffickingnot from violations of the city ordinance banning sleeping or lying on the sidewalk. Moreover, the police offer everyone picked up for a misdemeanor the option of entering rehabilitation instead of going to jail, as part of a program called Streets or Services, or SOS. (Arrestees who have been convicted of violence in the last five years, are registered sex offenders or have outstanding warrants against them are not eligible for SOS. This modest safety precaution disqualified three-quarters of the misdemeanor arrestees over the last year, a measure of the true nature of the skid row street population.)
Amazingly, almost a quarter of eligible arrestees opt for jail, even though SOS requires a mere three weeks in a rehab-and-housing program in order to purge an offense from ones record. Why? Because the lure of the streets is simply more powerful. Of those who did enroll over the course of the last year, only 16% stayed for the offense-clearing 21 days, and only 1% lasted 90 days.
Myth: The police are abusing the homeless. Reality: The police are the most constant source of help in the area, and the homeless know it.
If the Safer City Initiative were in fact the travesty that critics claim, the reception that Cmdr. Andrew Smith and his officers get when they travel the streets would be far different from the love-fest that currently greets them. One afternoon this August when I walked through the streets with Smith, a wizened vagrant on 5th Street shouted: “Hey, man!” and gave him a fist-to-fist handshake. As a drug bust was enfolding on Crocker Street, a middle-aged woman, reeking of beer, approached Smith. “You got promoted,” she beamed. “I thought you did wonderful. The next step is chief.”
The foot soldiers of downtowns Central Division enjoy a similar rapport with the street population. An alcoholic woman smiles at Officer Deon Joseph as he ambles down San Julian Street, once the heart of skid row depravity. “How are you, Officer Joseph?” she says. He asks her, “What are you seeing down here?”
“Everyone but the right guy,” she responds. “The streets are getting a little cleaner, though.” Many vagrants call officers by their first names, part of the complex web of formal authority and personal connectedness that defines police-community relations on skid row. Since Safer City began, the homeless have started approaching officers on the street or in the station house to seek assistance, a mark of how the officers are perceived.
Myth: People live on the streets because they cant find housing. Reality: Many people are there because they choose to live without responsibilities.
“If someone wanted to get off the streets, they could,” said a supervisor at the Volunteers of America drop-in center who asked not to be identified. “Theyre out there by choice.”
Robert Tapia, a former methamphetamine dealer who now works security at the Union Rescue Mission, said: “They dont want to abide by the rulesno hats, no alcohol.” Tapia encourages mission “guests” to enter rehabilitation, but they usually refuse. Ken Williams, now in recovery, came from Long Beach to skid row a decade ago to indulge his crack and alcohol habits. “I didnt want to get off the streets because I didnt want to conform to any rules,” he recalled.
The LAPD estimates that there are between 50 and 140 empty shelter beds on a typical night on skid row. But outreach workers who try to persuade people to use the shelters say they are turned down more often than not. Advocates for the homeless have crafted a series of dodges to deny this fact. UCLA law professor Gary Blasi claims, for instance, that its unfair to expect someone to take up the offer of shelter when doing so requires “splitting up with your spouse and giving up everything you have.” But by all accounts, the number of married couples on skid row is extremely small. And the Central City East Assn. funds and operates a warehouse where people can store nearly every kind of possession for free.
Myth: The homeless oppose the Safer City Initiative. Reality: Although the civil liberties groups and homeless advocates clearly oppose the police presence in skid row, many of the people I met on the streets want more policing, not less.
Jimmy, a middle-aged ex-convict, says he has “seen a lot of things change” since getting out of prison in 2003 for attempted murder. “Theres less crime; women are not getting harassed the way they used to.” But hed like even more law enforcement. “Theyre missing some things that are going on,” he said.
The Safer City Initiative has saved more lives in a year than decades of litigation by homeless advocates ever achieved. Skid rows officers are dislodging a culture of anarchy that allowed crime and violence to flourish at the expense of people trying to get back on their feet. Halting Safer City would return skid row to the brutal law of the jungle and help only drug lords and other predators.
Original Source: http://articles.latimes.com/2007/nov/18/opinion/op-mac_donald18