Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

The Miami Herald

 

By Steering Right, Fox News Speaks for Ignored Millions; AFTER 10 YEARS

October 07, 2006

By Brian C. Anderson

PRINTER FRIENDLY

Fox News turns 10 this week, and it has every reason to celebrate. Launched by media tycoon Rupert Murdoch and former political consultant Roger Ailes as a refuge for viewers fed up with real or perceived liberal bias elsewhere in the media, Fox is the undisputed ratings champion of cable news.

It has been trouncing CNN, MSNBC and CNBC for years and sometimes draws a fatter audience share than all its competitors combined, though viewership has slumped a little of late. Pugnacious Bill O'Reilly and conservative tough guy Sean Hannity have become two of the nation's most powerful broadcasters thanks to this kind of ratings pull. Fox is the news media success story of the last decade.

Liberals aren't celebrating the channel's birthday, though. Even before an angry Bill Clinton challenged Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace a couple of weeks ago, accusing him of ''a nice little conservative hit job'' after getting pressed about his record on fighting al Qaeda, Democratic pols and advocates have relentlessly attacked the cable network, accusing it of being a Republican propaganda mill. Al Gore has likened Fox to a right-wing ''fifth column.'' Leftist groups, including MoveOn.org, funded the documentary Outfoxed , which purports to expose the channel's nefarious Republican agenda, and petitioned the Federal Trade Commission to ban Fox's use of its famous ''Fair and Balanced'' slogan as deceptive advertising.

Success breeds hysteria

'When a news outlet is allowed to blur the lines between opinion and journalism and call it `fair and balanced,' I think it's confusing to consumers of information in this country, and it's dangerous to democracy,'' fretted an official at Common Cause, one of the organizations joining the petition. Hollywood celebrities never miss an opportunity to bash ''Faux News.'' Comedy Central's witty Colbert Report is a nightly satire of the channel and of O'Reilly in particular.

What explains all this hysteria? Success, of course.

The propaganda charge is unfair, at least when it comes to the network's presentation of news. In the 2004 presidential race, Fox pollsters consistently underestimated President Bush's support. In its final preelection poll, Fox had Kerry winning by a couple of points, one of the only polls to show the Democrat on top. I'm not sure a right-wing fifth column would do that.

In a recent comprehensive study by University of California, Los Angeles political scientist Tim Groseclose and University of Missouri, Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Milyo found Brit Hume's Special Report -- Fox's most straightforward news show -- more centrist than any of the three major networks' evening newscasts, all of which leaned left.

The program is a model of smart news television.

And although it's true that the network's opinion shows (as opposed to its news shows) are, as they're supposed to be, noisily and opinionated, it's equally true that Fox's biggest star, O'Reilly, is no mainstream Republican. He regularly charges the oil companies with price-gouging and attacks big business for squashing the little guy. And who can say what host Greta Van Susteren's politics are? She mostly zeroes in on lurid murder mysteries and scandals.

Anti-elitist message

Liberals troop into and out of the Fox studios every day -- some of them, like host Alan Colmes and news analyst Marvin Kalb, affiliated with the channel. There's no doubt, of course, that Fox News is more conservative than CBS or CNN. But, after all, that was its founding mission.

Fox's real ethos is not Republican but anti-elitist -- a major reason it connects with so many Americans and annoys so many coastal elites. ''There's a whole country that elitists will never acknowledge,'' Ailes once observed. 'What people resent deeply out there are those in the `blue states' thinking they're smarter.''

This anti-elitism shows itself in Fox's pro-U.S. stance in covering the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and its broadcasters' use of terms such as ''terrorist'' instead of ''militant'' to refer to . . . well, terrorists. Since the Vietnam War era, mainstream journalists have tended to see such blunt language and side-taking as unsophisticated, a betrayal of journalistic objectivity.

Another aspect of Fox's anti-elitism: Christians, far from being seen as lunatics or curiosities -- as too often is the case in the mainstream media -- actually get some respect.

What really frustrates liberals about Fox, though, is simply that, along with talk radio and the conservative blogosphere, it has helped shatter the left's near-monopoly on news and information. Fox's opinion-driven programming gives conservatives and liberals a chance to get a hearing for their ideas. But Democratic politicians and activists who go on Fox also must defend their views, often against tough questioning, something that happens less often on the networks, where most journalists are left-of-center, survey after survey has shown.

 

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494