Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook  Find us on Twitter      
   
     
 

The New York Times

 

Monopoly Power

July 30, 2006

By Nicole Gelinas

PRINTER FRIENDLY

Independent generators like Astoria Energy build plants to meet demand because they face competitive pressure: if one company doesn’t build a plant, another will. But Con Ed, a monopoly, has no competitive pressure to distribute power more efficiently.

Since Con Ed is a monopoly, state regulators supervise it: the company depends on regulators to allow it to pass the cost of network upgrades to customers. But regulators aren’t solely interested in performance during peak usage; they’re also interested in keeping rates low.

It thus falls to Mayor Michael Bloomberg to see that Con Ed’s planned investments in upgrading its system — $5.3 billion over three years — are enough and that equipment isn’t too old or inadequate, as it was in Queens this year and in Washington Heights seven summers ago. When Con Ed and the state fail, New York City suffers.

Original Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/opinion/nyregionopinions/30CIgelinas.html?_r=4&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

 

 
 
 

Thank you for visiting us. To receive a General Information Packet, please email support@manhattan-institute.org
and include your name and address in your e-mail message.

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494