Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      

The New York Times


Monopoly Power

July 30, 2006

By Nicole Gelinas

Independent generators like Astoria Energy build plants to meet demand because they face competitive pressure: if one company doesn't build a plant, another will. But Con Ed, a monopoly, has no competitive pressure to distribute power more efficiently.

Since Con Ed is a monopoly, state regulators supervise it: the company depends on regulators to allow it to pass the cost of network upgrades to customers. But regulators aren't solely interested in performance during peak usage; they're also interested in keeping rates low.

It thus falls to Mayor Michael Bloomberg to see that Con Ed's planned investments in upgrading its system—$5.3 billion over three years—are enough and that equipment isn't too old or inadequate, as it was in Queens this year and in Washington Heights seven summers ago. When Con Ed and the state fail, New York City suffers.

Original Source:



America's Legal Order Begins to Fray
Heather Mac Donald, 09-14-15

Ray Kelly, Gotham's Guardian
Stephen Eide, 09-14-15

Time to Trade in the 'Cadillac Tax' on Health Insurance
Paul Howard, 09-14-15

Hillary Charts the Wrong Path on Wage Inequality
Scott Winship, 09-11-15

Women Would Be Helped the Most By an End to the 'Marriage Penalty'
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 09-11-15

A Smarter Way to Raise Paychecks
Oren Cass, 09-10-15

Gambling with New York's Pension Funds
E. J. McMahon, 09-10-15

Vets Who Still Serve: After Disasters, Team Rubicon Picks Up the Pieces
Howard Husock, 09-10-15


The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2015 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494