Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Daily News

 

Outlaw Bullies? It Just Won't Work

October 13, 2003

By Kay S. Hymowitz

What's not to like in legislation with a title like Dignity in All Schools Act? That's the high-minded name of a bill certain to pass in the City Council that would require the Education Department to design policies to stop harassment as well as to keep records of bullying in public schools.

Too bad that instead of bringing dignity to the blackboard jungle, the bill will only politicize, and bureaucratize a serious dis­cipline problem.

The bill begins with the assumption that schoolyard bullies are best seen as ad­olescent racists, sexists and homophobes. The bill's architects want to stop "harass­ment and bullying" based on race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation and other attributes that historically have giv­en, rise to discrimination.

Councilwoman Christine Quinn (D-Manhattan) justified her support because of "a crisis of bias in this city" while Coun­cilman. Michael McMahon (D-Staten Is­land) said, "The bully of today is the hate-crime perpetrator of tomorrow."

The Empire State Pride Agenda, a gay lobbying organization, has been active in supporting the bill and helped to push through the similar Dignity for All Stu­dents Act in the Assembly in the spring.

But is bigotry what really drives the bul­ly? Yes, there is racial tension in the schools. And, yes, gay kids get bullied a lot. But so do fat kids, cross-eyed kids, kids who wear dorky clothes or have a lot of bad hair days.

What the bullying-equals-hate-crime theorists don't grasp is that kids bully not because they are prejudiced in any famil­iar adult sense but because they are crude, Darwinian creatures trying to stake 'out territory and proclaim their dominance. They look for weakness —that's why small kids are so often targets — but anything that hints of vulnerability will do. According to an article in Educa­tion Next by Marc Epstein, one city high school needed to set up a separate cafete­ria for freshmen because they were being so tormented by upperclassmen.

Consider the tragic case of J. Daniel Scruggs, whose mother was convicted last week of creating an unhealthy home by a Connecticut court. The 12-year-old hanged himself because he was bullied mercilessly — for being small, dressing in filthy clothes, smelling bad and being a temperamental crybaby.

The best way to save kids like Daniel is not through an anti-bias campaign. It's not even — or not only — to discipline bul­lies. It's to smash the peer-driven hierar­chy that sets the tone in most middle and high schools. Schools without bullies —and though rare, there are such things —are places where dynamic principals build a supportive but serious community whose norms are set by adults. One rea­son many reform-minded educators pre­fer smaller schools is because they make it easier for adults to cultivate an adult-driven communal ethos.

Instead of encouraging educators to cre­ate decent communities, the Council's bill would only add to the regulations and pa­perwork that turn principals into distract­ed bureaucrats.

Moreover, consultants and sensitivity workshops — the inevitable result of the bill's employee training requirement —will only add to the sense among princi­pals and teachers that their school is un­der the control of remote outsiders with little grasp of their students and neighbor­hood.

The truth is that discipline codes and regulations cannot socialize the Darwini­an adolescent, only adults can do that. The Council bill is no help there.

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

Afroducking The Law: Deadly Excuses For Endangering Others
Nicole Gelinas, 11-17-14

2014s Most Encouraging Democratic Victory
Daniel DiSalvo, 11-14-14

Bring Deferred Prosecution Agreements Out Of The Shadows
James R. Copland, 11-12-14

Coal Trumps IPCC, Again
Robert Bryce, 11-12-14

World Leaders, Ignore Obama And Do These Five Things Instead
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 11-12-14

ACA Architect: The Stupidity Of The American Voter Led Us To Hide ACA Costs
Avik Roy, 11-11-14

Cancer Drug Prices: A Convenient Scapegoat for a Complex Problem
Paul Howard, 11-11-14

A Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Obamacare
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 11-11-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494