Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      

New York Daily News


Outlaw Bullies? It Just Won't Work

October 13, 2003

By Kay S. Hymowitz

What's not to like in legislation with a title like Dignity in All Schools Act? That's the high-minded name of a bill certain to pass in the City Council that would require the Education Department to design policies to stop harassment as well as to keep records of bullying in public schools.

Too bad that instead of bringing dignity to the blackboard jungle, the bill will only politicize, and bureaucratize a serious dis­cipline problem.

The bill begins with the assumption that schoolyard bullies are best seen as ad­olescent racists, sexists and homophobes. The bill's architects want to stop "harass­ment and bullying" based on race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation and other attributes that historically have giv­en, rise to discrimination.

Councilwoman Christine Quinn (D-Manhattan) justified her support because of "a crisis of bias in this city" while Coun­cilman. Michael McMahon (D-Staten Is­land) said, "The bully of today is the hate-crime perpetrator of tomorrow."

The Empire State Pride Agenda, a gay lobbying organization, has been active in supporting the bill and helped to push through the similar Dignity for All Stu­dents Act in the Assembly in the spring.

But is bigotry what really drives the bul­ly? Yes, there is racial tension in the schools. And, yes, gay kids get bullied a lot. But so do fat kids, cross-eyed kids, kids who wear dorky clothes or have a lot of bad hair days.

What the bullying-equals-hate-crime theorists don't grasp is that kids bully not because they are prejudiced in any famil­iar adult sense but because they are crude, Darwinian creatures trying to stake 'out territory and proclaim their dominance. They look for weakness —that's why small kids are so often targets — but anything that hints of vulnerability will do. According to an article in Educa­tion Next by Marc Epstein, one city high school needed to set up a separate cafete­ria for freshmen because they were being so tormented by upperclassmen.

Consider the tragic case of J. Daniel Scruggs, whose mother was convicted last week of creating an unhealthy home by a Connecticut court. The 12-year-old hanged himself because he was bullied mercilessly — for being small, dressing in filthy clothes, smelling bad and being a temperamental crybaby.

The best way to save kids like Daniel is not through an anti-bias campaign. It's not even — or not only — to discipline bul­lies. It's to smash the peer-driven hierar­chy that sets the tone in most middle and high schools. Schools without bullies —and though rare, there are such things —are places where dynamic principals build a supportive but serious community whose norms are set by adults. One rea­son many reform-minded educators pre­fer smaller schools is because they make it easier for adults to cultivate an adult-driven communal ethos.

Instead of encouraging educators to cre­ate decent communities, the Council's bill would only add to the regulations and pa­perwork that turn principals into distract­ed bureaucrats.

Moreover, consultants and sensitivity workshops — the inevitable result of the bill's employee training requirement —will only add to the sense among princi­pals and teachers that their school is un­der the control of remote outsiders with little grasp of their students and neighbor­hood.

The truth is that discipline codes and regulations cannot socialize the Darwini­an adolescent, only adults can do that. The Council bill is no help there.



5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldnt Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked Ebola Czar With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is UnclearJust As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14


The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494