Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
search  
 
Subscribe   Subscribe   MI on Facebook Find us on Twitter Find us on Instagram      
 
 
   
 
     
 

New York Post

 

The Mayor's Tax Hike Isn't 'Little'

February 03, 2014

By Lawrence Mone

’We will ask the very wealthy to pay a little more in taxes so that we can offer full-day universal pre-K and after-school programs. . . And when we say ’a little more,’ we can rightly emphasize the ’little.’ Those earning between $500,000 and $1 million a year, for instance, would see their taxes increase by an average of $973 a year. That’s less than three bucks a day — about the cost of a small soy latte at your local Starbucks.”

That’s how Mayor de Blasio described his proposed tax increase in his inaugural address. But the reality is that when those making over $1 million a year are factored in, the average tax hike comes to about $12,000.

Both de Blasio’s figures and mine are based on calculations by the Independent Budget Office. The IBO showed that de Blasio’s plan to raise the city’s personal-income tax rate from 3.876 percent to 4.41 percent on those earning more than $500,000 would indeed raise taxes by $973 on the 21,000 filers earning between $500,000 and $1 million. But if you include the 19,000 filers in New York City that bring in more than $1 million annually, the average tax increase rises to $12,038.

In percentage terms, the increase to the tax rate on income above $500,000 would be 13.8 percent. And this same group is already being socked with the Obama administration’s hikes in the income and capital-gains taxes, and a special Medicare investment tax. All totaled, the increases on the wealthiest are not “little” at all.

There are real questions emerging as to why de Blasio wants these tax increases, as it looks increasingly like they have little to do with improving education.

In his budget address, Gov. Cuomo already offered a plan to expand pre-K and after school programs throughout the state without raising taxes. And if the Cuomo plan isn’t sufficient for de Blasio, another IBO analysis shows that New York City could raise more than enough to pay for pre-K and after school ($535 million) by requiring employees and pre-Medicare eligible retirees to contribute 10 percent of their health-care premiums, which would still leave them below private-sector contribution rates. (It is also worth noting that New York City already spends nearly $25 billion a year on education, about $22,000 per student.)

The 40,000 households earning more than $500,000 already contribute 43 percent of the city’s income-tax revenues. These folks are a highly mobile group and many are already fleeing to low-tax states like Florida. Do we really want to encourage that trend?

The de Blasio tax hike is not little, not fair and not good policy. At some point New York’s high earners will say “enough is enough.”

Original Source: http://nypost.com/2014/02/03/the-mayors-tax-hike-isnt-little/

 

 
PRINTER FRIENDLY
 
LATEST FROM OUR SCHOLARS

5 Reasons Janet Yellen Shouldn’t Focus On Income Inequality
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-20-14

Why The Comptroller Race Matters
Nicole Gelinas, 10-20-14

Obama Should Have Picked “Ebola Czar” With Public-Health Experience
Paul Howard, 10-18-14

Success Of Parent Trigger Is Unclear­—Just As Foes Want
Ben Boychuk, 10-18-14

On Obamacare's Second Birthday, Whither The HSA?
Paul Howard, 10-16-14

You Can Repeal Obamacare And Keep Kentucky's Insurance Exchange
Avik Roy, 10-15-14

Are Private Exchanges The Future Of Health Insurance?
Yevgeniy Feyman, 10-15-14

This Nobel Prize-Worthy Economist Figured Out How To Destroy Terrorism
Diana Furchtgott-Roth, 10-15-14

 
 
 

The Manhattan Institute, a 501(c)(3), is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas
that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.

Copyright © 2014 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494