Economics, Economics Employment
July 28th, 2016 1 Minute Read Issue Brief by Oren Cass

Issues 2016: Is a $15 Federal Minimum Wage Appropriate?

The size and diversity of the U.S. labor market make a national lens inappropriate for evaluating minimum-wage policy. A dramatic increase in the federal minimum wage—to $15 or even $12 per hour—would replace a system that tailors policy to local conditions with a system that imposes a single standard from America’s most prosperous cities on less affluent areas that can ill afford it.

  • The ratio of the minimum wage to the median wage in the U.S.—based on the controlling federal, state, and local minimums—is 0.47: this ratio aligns closely with the standard 0.5 benchmark and places the U.S. above the 0.46 average for comparable advanced, market-based economies.
  • The 13 states with the highest median wage all have a minimum wage at least one dollar above the federal minimum.
  • Relative to their median wages, imposing a minimum wage of $15 per hour in places like El Paso and Myrtle Beach—where the median wage level is less than $13 per hour—would be the equivalent of imposing a minimum wage of $30 per hour in Washington, D.C., or Silicon Valley.

READ FULL REPORT

Return to the Manhattan Institute's Issues 2016 series

______________________

Oren Cass is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Follow him on Twitter here.

Photo by Otto Yamamoto / Flickr

Donate

Are you interested in supporting the Manhattan Institute’s public-interest research and journalism? As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, donations in support of MI and its scholars’ work are fully tax-deductible as provided by law (EIN #13-2912529).