The Mission of the Manhattan Institute is
to develop and disseminate new ideas that
foster greater economic choice and
individual responsibility.

Education Working Paper  No. 10
SCDP-06-01
January 2006


An Evaluation of the Effect of D.C.'s Voucher Program on Public School Achievement and Racial Integration After One Year

References

  • Belfield, C. R., and Levin, H. H. (2002). The Effects of Competition on Educational Outcomes: A Review of the Evidence. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
  • Blair, J. P., and Staley, S. (1995). “Quality Competition and Public Schools: Further Evidence.” Economics of Education Review, 14(2).
  • Borland, M. V., and Howson, R. M. (1992). “Students’ Academic Achievement and the Degree of Market Concentration in Education.” Economics of Education Review, 11(1).
  • ———. (1993). “On The Determination of the Critical Level of Market Concentration in Education.” Economics of Education Review, 12(2).
  • ———. (1995). “Competition, Expenditures, and Student Performance in Mathematics: A Comment on Crouch et al.” Public Choice, 87.
  • Chakrabarti, R. (2005). “Impact of Voucher Design on Public School Performance: Evidence from Florida and Milwaukee.” Harvard University.
  • Dee, T. S. (1998). “Competition and the Quality of Public Schools.” Economics of Education Review, 17(4).
  • Figlio, D. N., and C. E. Rouse. (2005). Do Accountability and Voucher Threats Improve Low-Performing Schools?” University of Florida, Princeton University, and NBER.
  • Fuller, H. L., and Greiveldinger, D. (2002). “The Impact of School Choice on Racial Integration in Milwaukee Private Schools.” American Education Reform Council manuscript.
  • Greene, J. P. (1998). “Civic Values in Public and Private Schools.” In Learning from School Choice, ed. P. Peterson and B. Hassel. Brookings Institution.
  • ———. (1999). “The Racial, Economic, and Religious Context of Parental Choice in Cleveland.” Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management meeting.
  • ———. (2002). 2001 Education Freedom Index. Manhattan Institute Civic Report 24.
  • ———. (2005). “Choosing Integration.” In School Choice and Diversity: What the Evidence Says, ed. J. T. Scott. Teachers College Press.
  • ———, and Forster, G. (2002). “Rising to the Challenge: The Effect of School Choice on Public Schools in Milwaukee and San Antonio.” Manhattan Institute Civic Bulletin 27.
  • ———, and Forster, G. (2004). “The Teachability Index: Can Disadvantaged Students Learn?” Manhattan Institute Education Working Paper 6.
  • ———, and Winters, M. A. (2004). “Competition Passes the Test.” Education Next, 4(3).
  • Hammons, C. W. (2001). “The Effects of Town Tuitioning in Vermont and Maine.” Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation.
  • Hanushek, E. A., and Rivkin, S. G. (2002) “Does Public School Competition Affect Teacher Quality?” In The Economics of School Choice, ed. C. Hoxby. University of Chicago Press.
  • Hoxby, C. (1994). “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?” NBER Working Paper 4978.
  • ———. (2000). “Does Competition Benefit Students and Taxpayers?” The American Economic Review, 90(5).
  • ———. (2001). “The Rising Tide.” Education Next, 1(4).
  • Jepson, C. (1999) “The Effects of Private School Competition on Student Achievement.” Unpublished paper.
  • Marlow, M. L. (1997). “Public Education Supply and Student Performance.” Applied Economics, 29.
  • ———. (1999). “Spending, School Structure, and Public Education Quality: Evidence from California.” Economics of Education Review, 19(1).
  • Ritter, G., Rush, A., and Rush, J. (2002). “How Might School Choice Affect Racial Integration in Schools? New Evidence from the ECLS-K.” Georgetown Public Policy Review.
  • Sander, W. (1999). “Private Schools and Public School Achievement.” The Journal of Human Resources, 34.
  • Walberg, H. J. (1993). “Losing Local Control of Education: Cost and Quality Implications.” Heartland Policy Study, 59.
  • West, M. R., and Peterson, P. E. (2005). “The Efficacy of Choice Threats Within School Accountability Systems: Results from Legislatively Induced Experiments.” Paper presented before the Annual Conference of the Royal Economic Society, University of Nottingham.
  • Wolf, P., Gutmann, B., Eissa, N., Puma, M., and Silverberg, M. (2005). “Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: First-Year Report on Participation.” U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Zanzig, B. R. (1997). “Measuring the Impact of Competition in Local Government Education Markets on the Cognitive Achievement of Students.” Economics of Education Review, 16(4).

 


Center for Civic Innovation.

School Choice Demonstration Project.

EMAIL THIS | PRINTER FRIENDLY

EWP 10 PDF (137 kb)

PRESS RELEASE

SUMMARY:
This study evaluates the initial effect of Washington, D.C.’s Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP) on the academic performance of public schools and its effects on the opportunities that District students have to attend integrated schools. The OSP is a federally sponsored school voucher program that provides vouchers worth up to $7,500 for an estimated 1,800 to 2,000 students in the District of Columbia. Students can use the scholarships to pay tuition at participating private schools in the District. The pilot program is designed to last for five years.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

ABOUT EDUCATION WORKING PAPERS

Previous Research and Theoretical Expectations on the Effect of Vouchers on Public School Academic Performance

Previous Research and Theory on the Effect of Vouchers on Racial Integration

Evaluating the Effect of Vouchers on D.C. Public Schools After One Year

Results and Discussion of the Effect of Voucher Competition on Public School Academic Performance

Evaluating the Potential Effect of Vouchers on Racial Integration

Results and Discussion of Evaluation of Racial Integration in Public and Voucher Schools

CONCLUSION

ENDNOTES

REFERENCES

APPENDIX:

Table 1: Effect of Voucher Competition on Public School Performance

Table 2: Measures of School Segregation

Figure 1: Percent Minority Enrollment in Deciles

 


Home | About MI | Scholars | Publications | Books | Links | Contact MI
City Journal | CAU | CCI | CEPE | CLP | CMP | CRD | ECNY
Thank you for visiting us.
To receive a General Information Packet, please email support@manhattan-institute.org
and include your name and address in your e-mail message.
Copyright © 2009 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494