The Mission of the Manhattan Institute is
to develop and disseminate new ideas that
foster greater economic choice and
individual responsibility.

Education Working Paper
No. 2  August 2003


When Schools Compete: The Effects of Vouchers on Florida Public School Achievement

What the Press Said:

The Voucher Challenge: Competition helps public schools.
by Jay P. Greene & Marcus A. Winters, National Review Online, 5-11-04
Competition Passes the Test: Vouchers improve public schools in Florida
by Jay P. Greene & Marcus A. Winters, Education Next, Summer 2004
Vouchers will help public schools
By Jay P. Greene and Marcus A. Winters, The Christian Science Monitor, 8-28-03
Blame Blaine's bigotry Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, PA, 8-24-04
Programs are overhyped USA Today, 8-12-04
Programs are overhyped Yahoo News, 8-12-04
Fighting for School Choice in the Courts The Heartland Institute, IL - Jun 21, 2004
Press Journal editorial: Thumbs up, thumbs down Vero Beach Press-Journal, FL, 5-28-04
Link Shown Between School Vouchers, Improved Test Scores New York Sun, 5-11-04
He proffers the proof in voucher fights St. Petersburg Times, 9-2-03
Let's compete to fix schools NY Daily News, 8-31-03
D.C. Vouchers Washington Times, 8-31-03
EDUCATION: Affirming the obvious The Florida Times-Union, 8-24-03
A+ for Florida vouchers Washington Times, 8-24-03
Seebach: Competitive pressure a good thing for Fla. schools Rocky Mountain News, 8-23-03
Private schools accepting of questionnaire Palm Beach Post, 8-22-03
In South Florida Miami Herald, 8-21-03
Study: Vouchers a spur to schools: Two researchers link improved public schools to the specter of private competition. St. Petersburg Times, 8-20-03
Report: Vouchers have a positive effect on schools Tallahassee Democrat, 8-20-03
Report: Vouchers Improving Fla. Public Schools New York Sun, 8-20-03
Boehner Hails New Paper Showing Education Choice Gives Schools Incentive to Improve 8-20-03
Statement By: Governor Jeb Bush Regarding Manhattan Institute Study 8-19-03

 


Center for Civic Innovation.

EMAIL THIS | PRINTER FRIENDLY

EWP 02 PDF (72 kb)

WHAT THE PRESS SAID

SUMMARY:
This study, by Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Jay P. Greene, Ph.D., and Research Associate Marcus A. Winters, analyzes the effect of Florida’s A+ Program on public schools. Under the A+ Program, Florida’s high-stakes test is used to grade schools on a scale from A to F. If a school receives two F grades in any four-year period it is considered to be chronically failing and its students become eligible for vouchers they can use to attend other public or private schools. Proponents of school vouchers have long argued that competition for students and the funding they generate will give public schools powerful incentives to improve. This study shows that schools in direct competition with vouchers, or threatened by the prospect of vouchers, are making educational gains greater than those of other low-performing schools that aren’t facing voucher competition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Executive Summary

About the Authors

Acknowledgements

About Education Working Papers

Introduction

A Brief Description of the A+ Program

Previous Research

Method

The Five Categories

Voucher Eligible Schools

Voucher Threatened Schools

Always D Schools

Ever D Schools

Formerly Threatened Schools

School-Level Score Calculation

Results

Possible Explanations of the Results Other than a Voucher Effect

Failing Stigma

Regression to the Mean

Demographic Changes

Conclusion

Endnotes

References

Appendix

Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of Schools

Table 2: FCAT Math Test

Table 3: Stanford-9 Math Test

Table 4: FCAT Reading Test

Table 5: Stanford-9 Reading Test

Table 6: Demographic Characteristics of F and Low Performing Non-F Schools

Table 7: FCAT Math Test for Regression to the Mean

Table 8: Stanford-9 Math Test for Regression to the Mean

Table 9: FCAT Reading Test for Regression to the Mean

Table 10: Stanford-9 Reading Test for Regression to the Mean

Table 11: FCAT Math Test Controlling for Change in Demographics

Table 12: Stanford-9 Math Test Controlling for Change in Demographics

Table 13: FCAT Reading Test Controlling for Change in Demographics

Table 14: Stanford-9 Reading Test Controlling for Change in Demographics

 


Home | About MI | Scholars | Publications | Books | Links | Contact MI
City Journal | CAU | CCI | CEPE | CLP | CMP | CRD | ECNY
Thank you for visiting us.
To receive a General Information Packet, please email support@manhattan-institute.org
and include your name and address in your e-mail message.
Copyright © 2009 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494