Civic ReportNo. 34 March 2003Who Really Benefits from New York City’s Rent Regulation System?
Table A-9: Deregulation of All Stabilized Units, Median Predicted Rent Changes and Number of Units Affected, Lower- And Mid-Manhattan
100% Deregulation
Total Number of Stabilized Units
Median Stabilized Rent
Median Subsidy
Subsidy as Percent of Rent, Median
Median Rent Change from Deregulation
Median Percent Rent Change
Greenwich Village / Financial District
28,598
$956
$339
34%
$250
26%
Lower East Side / Chinatown
23,860
$682
*
Chelsea / Clinton / Midtown
33,061
$1000
$454
35%
$210
21%
Stuyvesant Town / Turtle Bay
42,997
$1050
$292
27%
$169
16%
Upper West Side
51,604
$875
$485
46%
$243
28%
Upper East Side
58,305
$1096
$418
38%
$211
19%
Note: * Effectively zero
Table A-10: Deregulation of All Stabilized Units, Median Predicted Rent Changes and Number of Units Affected, Queens
100% Deregulation Median Rent Change from Deregulation
Astoria / Jackson Heights / Sunnyside / Woodside
57,478
$700
$2
Elmhurst / Corona / Middle Village / Ridgewood / Forest Hills / Rego Park
59,803
$670
$13
2%
Flushing / Whitestone / Bayside / Little Neck / Bellerose / Rosedale / Hillcrest / Fresh Meadows / Kew Gardens / Woodhaven / Howard Beach / S. Ozone Park
63,210
Jamaica / Rockaways
16,200
$646
Note: * Effectively Zero
[Table 1] [Table 2] [Table 3] [Table 4] [Table 5] [Table 6] [Table 7] [Table 8] [Table 9] [Table A-1] [Table A-2] [Table A-3] [Table A-4] [Table A-5] [Table A-6] [Table A-7] [Table A-8] [Table A-9] [Table A-10] [Table A-11]