|The Mission of the Manhattan Institute is
foster greater economic choice and
Why the Long Face?
By E.J. MCMAHON
You wouldnt know it from all the long faces around Manhattan yesterday, but President Bushs re-election and the strengthening of Republican majorities in Congress was great news for New York City.
Over the past three decades, the citys economy has done best when Washington was most dedicated to a supply-side agenda. Gothams recovery from the fiscal crisis and economic crash of the 1970s was enormously aided by the Reagan boom of the 1980s. New York then lost hundreds of thousands of jobs in the wake of the Bush I and Clinton tax hikes of 1990 and 1993, which were compounded by near-simultaneous increases in state and city taxes.
The citys last economic recovery picked up steam only after the Republican congressional majority made its influence felt, starting in 1995. The economic highlight of the Clinton-Gingrich era was the 1998 federal capital-gains tax cut, which added fuel to skyrocketing market indexes while encouraging a level of investment that contributed to New Yorks fastest economic growth in a half-century.
But an even bigger boost came when New York needed it most in the form of Mr. Bushs 2001 and 2003 tax cut packages, which have returned $14 billion to New Yorkers during four tumultuous years rocked by a recession, a bear market, and the September 11 attack. Tuesdays election results mean tens of billions more in savings will flow over the next few years to New Yorkers in every tax bracket, including middle-class breadwinners who would considered wealthyin less expensive living environments,and tens of thousands of wealth-creating entrepreneurs and small business owners.
The 2003 reduction in federal taxes on dividends and capital gains also were a tonic for the citys securities industry, which accounts for an estimated one-quarter of New Yorks economic activity and nearly one-fifth of its wage income. City Council Speaker Gifford Miller unintentionally underscored this point in a recent radio debate, when he complained that a tax cut was wasted on the wealthy because theyre just going to redistribute it around their portfolio. (Memo to the Speaker: Uhwhere are those portfolios managed?)
Ironically, Mr. Bush also shielded Mr. Miller and other New York politicians from the full consequences of their own bad decisions over the past two years. His 2003 tax cuts were signed into law just two weeks after the State Legislature in Albany, overriding Governor Patakis vetoes, enacted significant temporary increases in both state and city income taxes. The positive effect of the lower federal rates momentarily swamped the negative effects of higher state and city tax rates.
By the same token, just as supply-side theory would predict, lower federal taxes on dividends and long-term capital gains have prompted many more New Yorkers to earn income in these categories, which Albany and City Hall continue to tax at the same rates as wage income.The predictable result: state and city revenues grew sharply above projections in 2003-04.
Looking ahead,Mr.Bush has set his sights on more fundamental reform and simplification of the federal tax code.While details of what he has in mind have yet to emerge, he clearly wants to complete the job of removing disincentives to savings and investment.
The ownership society that is the centerpiece of Mr.Bushs domestic program,including private Social Security accounts, represents a tremendous potential boon to millions of striving New York workers and their families. Its also a tremendous business opportunity for Manhattans talented financial entrepreneurs.
Of course, New Yorks economy doesnt begin or end with the stock market.The city badly needs to grow more diversified, to retain and attract more well-paying jobs while stopping the continuing steady leakage of market share in securities industry and related jobs. That wont happen unless much more is done to reduce the enormous cost burden imposed on the local economy by city and state governments.
While the national trend is obviously the single most important factor,
New Yorks longterm economic fate remains largely in its own hands.
Four more years of Mr. Bush will at least ensure the federal government
is a help, not a hindrance, to New Yorks prospects for growth.
E.J. McMahon is director of the Empire Center of the Manhattan Institute.
©2004 The New York Sun
Home | About MI | Scholars | Publications | Books | Links | Contact MI|
City Journal | CAU | CCI | CEPE | CLP | CMP | CRD | ECNY
|Thank you for visiting us. |
To receive a General Information Packet, please email firstname.lastname@example.org
and include your name and address in your e-mail message.
|Copyright © 2009 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.|
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494