SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION

ENERGY MYTHS

ENVIRONMENTAL MYTHS

OPEN QUESTIONS AND OVERLOOKED REALITIES

POLICY IMPLICATIONS
APPENDIX


 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

America faces crucial energy-policy decisions. Should we drill into petroleum reserves in Alaska to increase our domestic supply of oil? Should we reduce our reliance on oil, and, if so, how? Should we subsidize the development of alternative fuel sources, such as hydrogen and ethanol, or should we build more nuclear power plants? Should we invest in clean-coal technologies, wind farms, or solar power? Should we promote energy efficiency, or seek to reduce consumption? How should we react to global warming? Should we ratify the Kyoto Protocol? Above all, how do we balance our needs for energy and economic growth with the responsibility of stewardship over the earth?

Making these decisions wisely will require an informed public. Few other policy areas, excepting perhaps ballistic-missile defense, hinge so heavily on our knowledge of science and technology. Making sound energy and environmental decisions demands a citizenry that is not just guided by a general philosophy but informed about specific facts.

How well-informed are we about energy and the environment? To answer that question, the Manhattan Institute commissioned Zogby International to ask 1,000 Americans nineteen questions on issues ranging from Saudi oil to global warming, and then asked me to assess the accuracy of those beliefs. The survey was conducted in September 2006. Zogby International followed up in February of this year by querying another random sample of Americans on five of the original questions. The purpose of the follow-up was to see whether public opinion and understanding of certain issues had changed, particularly because of the high profile given to renewable energy research by the president in his 2007 State of the Union address and by newly empowered congressional Democrats.

In the main sections of this report, I argue that most of the beliefs revealed by the poll are not supported by the facts. In the concluding sections, I consider the policy implications of these misunderstandings and recommend some basic policy reorientations.

In preparing this report, I drew extensively on the work of two individuals. One, Peter Huber, is a colleague at the Manhattan Institute’s Center for Energy and the Environment. Peter has produced two critically acclaimed books on these topics: Hard Green (1999) and The Bottomless Well (2005). The other source to whom I am indebted, Mark Mills, is a longtime friend of the Manhattan Institute. A physicist by training, Mark coauthored The Bottomless Well with Peter. Mark is a former staff consultant to the White House Science Office. As the sole author of this work, however, I should stress that any imperfections in it are my own.

I invite the reader to gauge his or her own energy literacy by taking the following multiple-choice quiz, based on the MI/Zogby survey. The main text of this document considers and explains the answers in detail, proceeding question by question.

Max Schulz

 

ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT: MYTHS AND FACTS

Download PDF (3MB)
Or request a hardcopy

Press Release

MEDIA INQUIRIES:

Clarice Smith
Deputy Director,
Communications
Manhattan Institute
(212) 599-7000

 

 


Copyright The Manhattan Institute 2007